Cat before the turbo?

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
lessthanjakejohn
Posts: 4105
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 6:39 am

Post

Do any of you emmisions minded people put your cat before your turbo to increase your "burn off" rate?


AceInhole
Posts: 478
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 1:36 pm

Post

Nope. I'm willing to bet no one does that here. For one thing, it would hurt spool up. For another, it complicates things quite a bit, as the turbo is usually placed right off the manifold. Placing a cat between the manifold and turbo would take up quite a bit of room.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

In 28 years I've never heard of such a thing. I would think it would make more sense to run dual race cats before that. Not to mention, you'd destroy the cat with all the heat from the motor.

WD

silviaNE
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:58 pm
Car: cars what else?

Post

puting a cat befor the turbo would decrease catalitic lightup time considerably, but it would reduce your turbos abilty to spool up greatly. Unless you are using a small turbo with a fast spoolup and are very emmisions minded then it could be done. But i strongly recomend you choose a differnt avenue. It is possible to turbo a car and still get decent emmisions, you will just have tokeep your hp goals on the low side to avoid gross polution.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I know the WRX comes from the factory with one of 3(?) cats before the turbo. Obviously, they did to meet US emissions. But I don't think anyone installing an aftermarket turbo system would be nearly as concerned about emissions as they would about performance. And like SilvisNE said, you probably can pass emissions test with the cat after the turbo.

encasemyheart
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 1:29 pm

Post

IWannaS15 wrote:I know the WRX comes from the factory with one of 3(?) cats before the turbo. Obviously, they did to meet US emissions.


This is true but also some of the biggest performance adders for the WRX are mods which replace those pre-turbo cats with straight-thru piping.

So it would hurt performance greatly.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

wouldn't the exhuast burn the cat's fur? That's kind of mean don't you think?

User avatar
fiznat
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 10:15 am
Car: Grown up :(
Contact:

Post

themadscientist wrote:wouldn't the exhuast burn the cat's fur? That's kind of mean don't you think?


lol nice one haha :D

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Turbo or no turbo, your emmisions shouldn't change. As long as your ecu is tuned to add the proper amount of fuel for the extra air then you won't have a problem at all.

WD

silviaNE
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:58 pm
Car: cars what else?

Post

the only concern is catalitic converter lightup time. some states have you run emissions with a cold car, and thats where the concern for emmisions is on startup.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”