Even with a higher rate, the home equity loan may be a better idea than taking the auto financing option.audtatious wrote:Hmmmm....
If cash is directly out of a savings account (or you have that much in checking) then cash is best. You should be able to finance a new Rogue at a rate cheaper than a Home Equity loan so that does not make sense.
No offense, but don't speak of things you know nothing about.Eikon wrote:Bad idea cowbell.. Your credit score has just dropped considerably.. hope you don't need to buy anything else for a while.
I know a fair amount about credit ratings and scoring after working four years in the mortgage industry. You're right that I should not have assumed that I knew your situation exactly, and rather should have given a general warning rather than one directed at you personally. But sharing that advice here could lead many people into making poor decisions, so I felt the need to share my negative thoughts about it.NeedMoreCowbell wrote:
No offense, but don't speak of things you know nothing about.
This info is outside the scope of this forum, but my credit score was over 800 before I used this (fairly common) technique and it's still over 800 after. My aggregate % utilization is under 20%. Credit's more than fine.
I don't want to turn this into a d*ck swinging contest, but I've worked at a bank for six years as a programmer and have been playing the 0% game in various degrees of refinement since after grad school. Aggregate utilization has little to do with individual utilization; aggregate implies "overall" - since I've done this for some time my overall credit lines are substantial and as such drawing out almost $40K brought me from 3% to 20%. Individual lines were drawn to 89% each; many say you can go to 99% but I play the game somewhat conservatively, which is why my score went dropped just four points, to this:Eikon wrote:
I know a fair amount about credit ratings and scoring after working four years in the mortgage industry. You're right that I should not have assumed that I knew your situation exactly, and rather should have given a general warning rather than one directed at you personally. But sharing that advice here could lead many people into making poor decisions, so I felt the need to share my negative thoughts about it.
The information presented in that link talks about maxing as many 0% credit offers as possible. That is harmful to a persons credit in many ways. First it will likely lead to scoring down due to having too many consumer credit cards. Second, it will lead a person to severely harm their score by maxing out those credit lines. The balance to limit ratio will be far too high for each account and lead to a large negative affect. Yet another negative impact will be the number of recent inquiries on credit, which will once again harm your credit score.
For you personally... if you've kept each of those accounts under 20% balance to limit ratio, and you've got sufficient positive history and length of history, then perhaps it's won't have a significant impact on your credit. I hope that's the case at least.
If you've done this recently, chances are you have not yet seen the affects on your credit. The scoring is done on a monthly basis, and often takes two or more months before the full impact is known.
Those with the highest credit scores generally thrash their credit utilization and then pay it down to a low amount. This rollercoaster effect will, in the long run, raise your score.audtatious wrote:I'd like to have a credit score over 800. My credit cards are either at 0 or <$300 ("we" have three cards, one is a simple Circuit City with 0 balance and the other two are USAA with 26k credit limits each and both have less than $300 on them). Both cars paid for. The only bill I owe is my home mortgage which is <1/5th my monthly income (not including my wifes income as an RN). Nothing is listed as even having a late payment and I have a very lengthy credit history. It's clean as hell
Kinda sux as I was expecting higher than I have. Oh well, top 2% will have to do for now.....
Well done!NeedMoreCowbell wrote:And lastly, I'm always right.
The rollercoaster effect is usually to a banks advantage as they usually receive some form of payback as far as interest goes. They are in it for the money and hate people who do not keep some form of balance on their card(s). FWIW, my credit has been trashed twice due to X-wives. In '02 I was only able to obtain a $500 credit line due to how bad my credit was and I hate to know what my FICO would have been at that time. Middle of '05 I was able to get it up to a whopping 702. Around March of this year it was up to 777 and it's now up to 793. Whatever I am doing it seems that I have been doing a relatively good job with itNeedMoreCowbell wrote:
Those with the highest credit scores generally thrash their credit utilization and then pay it down to a low amount. This rollercoaster effect will, in the long run, raise your score.
Between the wife and I we put anywhere from $2k to $4k a month on the credit cards as we are doing home improvements and I use my CC for travel expenses as well. The difference between my balance and the "rollercoaster" effect is I pay off the balance monthly as I don't want to pay a bank any form of interest charge if I don't have to. If that slows down the growth of my FICO then so be itNeedMoreCowbell wrote:As sick as it sounds, if you're not a big user of credit and you have large lines (and it sounds like you're both of these), your score won't grow significantly due to very low % utilization. I put everything I possibly can on credit, McDonalds, gas, groceries, etc. etc. and always pay in full each month.
I agree. My credit history shows numerous payoffs in the 100k+ range. I have had to tell my CC company to NOT increase my credit line as well since I don't need it. With just the two CC's the wife and I can charge $52k at a whim without touching any of our other investments. With FICO, I hear that is both a positive AND a negative to have huge unused credit lines available. I see no reason to even think about charging up CC's for anything at this point even though our rate is prime +0 (and I'm looking for something sub-prime to give me positioning power).NeedMoreCowbell wrote:In laymen's terms, think of credit cards as the mafia (not a stretch). You approach the mob and ask to borrow 100K. If all you've borrowed from him in the past is a few hundred bucks, he'll show you the door. If you've borrowed and paid back 50K, 60K, and 70K, he'll have no problem giving you the cash.
The credit card empire is there to make money at the expense of the borrowers. They will take any reason they can think of to increase their rates and there is not anything you can do about it other than try to find another card to transfer funds to. If you max out a card I can guarantee most CC companies will feel they "have you over a barrel" and will raise their rates automatically in order to gather additional income regardless of your FICO. Higher rates by one company may impact rates of other cards regardless of balance and that snowball effect can/will cause your FICO to drop.NeedMoreCowbell wrote:Be it the mob or a ruthless credit card empire, both will mess you up if you stumble in paying back, whether you borrowed $100,000 or $500.
Physical or mental?rsm wrote:so... ummm..... i'm like..... a theapist and stuff.