Post by
Eddie »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/eddie-u12286.html
Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:33 pm
Those tires do look wider than a 225/50/16 on an 8 in rim, but different tires have different tread widths although the section width is the same. Try a 205/55/16 like someone suggested. The side wall height is almost identical, but the slight stretch will help side wall height decrease a little. Another good option would be the 215/50/16.
The aspect ration is only a percentage of the section width. A 50 series tire can be taller than a 55 series tire. It all depends on the width of the tire.
ex: (245 mm)*(0.50) = 122.50 mm (205 mm)*(0.55) = 112.75 mm
(205 mm)*(0.55) = 112.75 mm (225 mm)*(0.50) = 112.50 mm***.25 mm diffence in side wall height is almost unmeasurable***
You ideally want to keep the over all diameter close to stock for your speedometer and abs if you have it. If you want to get technical you could calculate the oe s13 radius (tire and wheel) and use that to determine the size tire that will bring you closest to oe on a 16 in wheel.
for ddgsxr505:The smallest car section width I can think of is 145 and the width increases in increments of 10 from there. Thats why you never see a 200, 210, 220, etc.
With trying to stretch a 195/45/16 I would really be concerned about load index. It is 84 apposed to 88 of oe. Even maxing out the tire may not even have the same load carrying capacity of the oe tire set at 29 psi. Their will be very little margin to tweak tire pressure if any.