. I give you credit for trying.Datalux wrote:I actually asked if I could drive it around the parking lot and got a good natured but resounding NO from about 6 guys that were there.
Its definitely not the prettiest car, I still think the R34's and R33's look better. But then again, its not the ugliest car either. It could use some work on the front end though.spike228 wrote:I'm going to be the non-conformist here and say that it still looks like a mitsubishi eclipse with the proportions of a tonka truck.
Somewhat true... but id peg it as a eclipse/mustang body style... with the engine of a tonka truck!spike228 wrote:I'm going to be the non-conformist here and say that it still looks like a mitsubishi eclipse with the proportions of a tonka truck.
Ok then Where the hell are the K&N intakes for the coupes!!Datalux wrote:I didn't actually get to see the charts, but 441 BHP & 186 mph is what I was told when when I asked the tech. I got there just as it was hitting the top of the run and couldn't get close to the monitor because they were filming. We actually have 2 AWD dyno's, 1 RWD and 1 motorcycle (both Dynojets) as well as an engine dyno. There's some serious R&D that goes into the product that people just don't believe or know about. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXaRCxHPtiQ
Heck yeah i wish i had a K&N.08Coupe wrote:
Ok then Where the hell are the K&N intakes for the coupes!!
I thought it was self explanitory...dldjros69 wrote:WHAT IS this "currently" bull spit? huh?
I work for K&N.dldjros69 wrote:how do you know k&n is making something?