Last time I checked into something like that (state of MN) the rule was <if> he knew about an accident or flood or some such, and <if> you asked specifically if it had been in it, <then> he would have to answer truthfully.And if you can show they intentionally lied ,then you have a case.In this example if you specifcally asked "was it ever in a flood?" and he said "No" and you can show that it was and he knew then you'd have a case
I don't know how valid this really is but to this day when I buy a used car I alwasy ask specifically:" To your or your dealerships knowledge has this car ever been in a flodd?:"... in a major wreck?""in a minor wreck?""..stolen"". ever sold or titled for salvage reagardless of what it says on the current title"?
" are you aware of, or have suspicions of, any odometer rollback?"
In <all other> cases "as is" owns you, like SmithSR put it.
Fred...
