S. Drive is supposed to be an upgraded version of ES100. ES100 didn't have good reviews as far as I know. FK452s have pretty good reviews, so I thought FKs were better tires. Anyway, Ecsta ASX is supposed to be one level up than S. Drive, ES100, 912, 512, V4...etc, so we will see.simmode1 wrote:I wish I could comment. I've used Yokohama ES100's and Falken FK452's, but not the one's you've listed. I think the ones I had were rated a little higher. I hate my Falkens compared to my old Yokohamas...
Monstrously false. Their grip is nothing like an RE11/R1R/RS3.SX APPEAL wrote:I'd go with the Kumho ASX's ... grip like a UHP summer
The ASX is not a bad buy, I was not disputing that at all. Grip wise though, they fall very short of the tires I listed. Any 420 treadwear tire cannot be compared to a 140-180.SX APPEAL wrote:Maybe I was just overly impressed because they gripped a lot harder than I'd expected from a 420 treadwear all season tire. But whatever, I'll submit to the authority of the all knowing king of the road racing forums...![]()
I still maintain the ASX is a great buy for what the OP is looking for.

Keep in mind that.infiniti_lineup wrote:Piece of s*** tires. They made me spin out in light rain at 75% tread remaining. To OP and all others: never purchase Falken FK452 tires!simmode1 wrote: I've used ... Falken FK452's ... I hate my Falkens compared to my old Yokohamas...
Never purchase ANY Falken tires. They're all trash.infiniti_lineup wrote:Piece of s*** tires. They made me spin out in light rain at 75% tread remaining. To OP and all others: never purchase Falken FK452 tires!simmode1 wrote: I've used ... Falken FK452's ... I hate my Falkens compared to my old Yokohamas...
this this THIS!flohtingPoint wrote:
Never purchase ANY Falken tires. They're all trash.