Can anyone guess the specs?

Forum for Nissan wheel fitment, tire selection, suspension setup and brake discussions.
User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

I know they are LMGT4's. But I'm really bad at guessing diameter, width offset, tire size by just looking... Maybe you guys are better?





User avatar
Gabes13
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:59 am
Car: rb20det s13
Location: St. Pete, Fl.

Post

9.5 +30?idk but that looks good

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

My guess would be 25 or lower offsets, given the concave spoke design.


User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

pandapants wrote:9.5 +30?idk but that looks good
Yes, it does look good...
Rex wrote:My guess would be 25 or lower offsets, given the concave spoke design.
I don't know how Rota accomplishes this, but +30 can be concave too...
Dammitboy wrote:Finally got em'. Can't wait to get these on.
I think after seeing Dammitboy's 17x9+30's P45R's with 255/40/17, these might similar. Maybe with a spacer up front, 7mm maybe.

Any other thoughts/ideas? Can anyone tell if they are 17's or 18's? Anyone think tire size may be close to what Dammitboy is running?

After recently watching this video, I'm thinking 255's must be the sweet spot for s13 tires. I mean, if they're good enough for 500hp+ Time Attack Silvia's, I shouldn't need to go any wider on my pos...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vXemUK8Moo

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

simmode1 wrote:I don't know how Rota accomplishes this, but +30 can be concave too...
But we're not talking about Rota's are we??

Here's a thread with LM GT4's in 18 x 8.5 +25's that aren't concave. My guess would be once you go x 9.0 and have offsets in the 20's you get concave. See if you can find some for sale with actual pics to get a good idea.

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

Could be 18x9.5 +30, but 9.5 on the front of an S13 without over fenders isn't easy.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

Dude! Good job hunting that stuff down! Thanks!
Rex wrote:but 9.5 on the front of an S13 without over fenders isn't easy.
Where there's a will there's a way!

I'm hoping it will be easier fitting 17x9.5 rather than 18x9.5. Plus, I don't plan on slamming the car or tire tucking when I upgrade to coils...
Modified by simmode1 at 11:35 AM 2/24/2009

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

I think there's a certain aggressiveness if the front wheel isn't concave, but the back is. It's almost like saying the rear wheels are so big they bulge ... or something like that.

Kind of how the rears on this car are caved in more


User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

I can dig that, but I'm not into staggered fitment much. I'm a real symmetrical and orderly kind of guy... lol

I fell in love with the look of Bushido's setup, but wanted more funtionality than the stretched tires that he's running. So, until I wait for coils, i gather as much info as I can about proper fitment for the look & performance I want. This board and Zilvia's 'Maximum Rubber' thread have been really helpful...

User avatar
carmo
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Car: 92 Accord, 90 Civic, 89 240sx

Post

Yea those are 18s. That dood got his hands on a full set of rears (9.5 all the way around). Looks like he had to use wide body fenders to fit the fronts but judging by the gas door, the rear fenders are stock. This is good news for me!

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

Idk if you guys noticed but that blue hatch has widebody fenders on the front. So I'm assuming they're not staggered. I'd say around 18x9 +15 is close. Or 18x9.5 +30 as stated before.

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

carmo wrote:... Looks like he had to use wide body fenders to fit the fronts ...
AZ89two4Tsx wrote:Idk if you guys noticed but that blue hatch has widebody fenders on the front.
I wasn't "sure" but it looked like it, and if not, I'm not sure how he'd get 9.5's on the front of a S13, clear the suspension and not be "poking"?!?!

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

Rex wrote:I wasn't "sure" but it looked like it, and if not, I'm not sure how he'd get 9.5's on the front of a S13, clear the suspension and not be "poking"?!?!
It's all about offset! I've got pics of 18x10.5+18 all around on stock fenders. And I've heard that the optimal wheel and tire set up for s13's to maximize rubber was 17x10+23 265/35/17. But I have yet to find a wheel in that exact size...


Return to “Nissan Tires, Wheels, Brakes and Suspension”