Nope. fasteners are not on the torque chart. Loctite won't be much help since it could melt off when the caliper gets hot. and no way would i use high temp red loctite.PapaSmurf2k3 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 11:00 amIf you know the size and the grade of the bolt, you can just go by the toque chart.
.
I'd probably add some loctite in there too.
Thanks. The newer kits have the inner seal.EdBwoy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 11:10 amSorry I can't produce the numbers right now, but I know I went through some hurdles to get the torque spec. I tried combing through old videos to find them, but maybe I wrote them on a post-it note that has since been discarded.
Lessons learned
One thing I know is that I will never intentionally split those halves again. I had split them to allow the powdercoater better access upon request, but during installation it became more trouble than intended.
1. For me, no matter how well the tape job was done, some of the powdercoat cracked right at the mating surface when I bolted them together.
2. The rebuild kits in the market at the time assumed the halves wouldn't be split so they didn't offer that inner seal in the package (passes fluid inside the halves versus Brembo BBK that had a crossover tube).
Although the science seemed to hold up on my end, the only powdercoater I could find didn't want to try to bake anything with a rubber seal in it, so I decided to open them up and reuse the seals later.
3. Torque specs
Good luck with your project, and if I do find the numbers, I'll post them here.
I'm not a Pro like you but if one is being very thorough with cleaning up all components and using new seals, would it be safe to simply split the hairs by using 81nm or 60 ft-lbs?VStar650CL wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:21 pmConsidering the type of load they'd typically see, which is principally tension from heat expansion with some longitudinal torsion added when the brakes are applied, I'd think the evenness of torque across all 4 would be more important than a specific value. That might explain the wide variation in the spec.
As mentioned, my impression is it's probably a production thing. Based on that, I'd say their engineers probably grounded the spec at the "ideal" number and then expanded it +/- to match tool tolerances and worst-case calculations. So yes, I think splitting the difference is exactly the right thing, chances are that's the "ideal" number.
No, he did not but he hadn't called me back and when he does, I'll ask him.Yoda's Master wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:09 pmDid they happen to mention the torque for the 14mm bolt as well? front is 17mm, rear is 14mm. I'm thinking it's about 30 ft-lbs.
I emailed them separately also and was told the same for the front 69.2 - 93.6 Nm and 32.0 - 43.3 Nm for the rear.C6Joe1957 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:12 pmNo, he did not but he hadn't called me back and when he does, I'll ask him.Yoda's Master wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:09 pmDid they happen to mention the torque for the 14mm bolt as well? front is 17mm, rear is 14mm. I'm thinking it's about 30 ft-lbs.