Thankfully, the community surrounding the school and plenty of adults who caught wind.heliochrome85 wrote:im sorry, but who cares?
Expulsion. Plain and simple.mattblancarte wrote:Apparently, she had heard that Hispanic teenagers were threatening to engage in violent crime over the matter.
I don't believe anything coming from foxheliochrome85 wrote:im sorry, but who cares? like seriously. there are bigger concerns in the world other than a story that gets the feigned anger all whipped up.
somewhere someone is burning a flag. quick, how fast can we get Glenn Beck on the scene?!?!
Your mail must be slow, it's been The Atlantic for a while now.heliochrome85 wrote:msnbc is nothing to be proud of. and the nyt has been slipping.
real news comes from the christian science monitor, the economist, the atlantic monthly, the new republic, those sorts of souces
If only it was that simple. Speculatively, since I don't know all the facts, the school may not know who has been making threats or "complaints". Not to mention there has to be some reasonable semblance of proof. Imagine if the school did expel them and they had no reasonable evidence. That would just have lawsuit written all over it. The other edge of the sword here is that if they did follow through on the threats, then the kids parents can easily cause an uproar and perhaps file a lawsuit since the school has a responsibility to keep the kids safe within their control. Since the school had knowledge of the threats, a lack of action could be construed as a form of negligence in such a case. I agree with you in ideology here but the reality is much more complex. If anything, the action could buy them time to find the kids making such threats while protecting that kid from harm.AZhitman wrote:Expulsion. Plain and simple.
You wanna dabble in domestic terrorism, you little pricks? You want to commit HATE CRIMES (yes, I hate the term, but let's turn it around, shall we?)
That point wasn't relevant back then, and it isn't relevant now. Rabble-rousers will rouse rabble, and school administrators have a responsibility to try and defuse it.AZhitman wrote:If "Cinco de Mayo" was a real holiday, I'd care. It's not. Most Latinos don't even know why it exists.
And as such, expulsions would be appropriate.IBCoupe wrote:That point wasn't relevant back then, and it isn't relevant now. Rabble-rousers will rouse rabble, and school administrators have a responsibility to try and defuse it.AZhitman wrote:If "Cinco de Mayo" was a real holiday, I'd care. It's not. Most Latinos don't even know why it exists.
What you did there - I saw it.IBCoupe wrote:I don't remember anyone streaming one from their bicycle. Maybe we were all just commies.
Invalid and irrelevant. I can be a damn good auditor and still not maintain my own checkbook.srellim234 wrote:AZ complaining about California AGAIN! Why am I not surprised?
It's getting very old, AZ. Exactly when did Arizona achieve absolute perfection? Or are you just incapable of turning a critical eye at your own state?

AZhitman wrote: In other news... LEAVE CALIFORNIA ALONE!

This.srellim234 wrote:In the meantime, you don't let the kid keep placing himself in a possibly bad situation without telling him and also informing of what he can do to avoid getting "jumped" until you've had time to deal with the others.
That whole itty bitty text thing where I made the FOXNews reference? I hadn't actually seen the link; didn't work at work. It's funny how predictable these stories are.srellim234 wrote:If you watch the interviews you'll find that adults in the family ran to the press before any adult even met or talked with any school official.

