Post by
Darkness and Light »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/darkness-and-light-u5638.html
Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:03 pm
I'm trying to calculate airflow for the KA24DE to compare different compressor maps. My data set is:
132 cubic inches6800 rpm redline85% volumetric efficiency
Using the formula: (cid*rpm *0.5 *Ev) / 1728 = Airflow rateI calculated 220.76 cfm
Using the formula: cfm / 14.27 = lb/minI calculated 15.47 lb/min
Using a compressor map I found for a TB22 turbo off a 300ZX TT, I found the efficiency at several different boost levels to be:
7 psi (1.48 bar) 22.9 lb/min About 60%9 psi (1.61 bar) 24.9 lb/min Off the map, 55%?14 psi (2.0 bar) 30.94 lb/min Way off, 50%?
Obviously the TB22 is way too small its barely usable even at 7 psi. On the other hand I was looking at a baseline dyno of a KA24DE and peak power is made at about 5500 rpm. The power drops off badly afterwards and there is over 1300 more RPM till redline.
Since power is largely dependent on how much air and fuel an engine consumes I would assume this to mean that based on that dyno maximum airflow occurs at 5500 rpm. Would it be appropriate to base my airflow calculation on an RPM of 5500 rather then 6800?
Using an RPM of 5500 changes the airflow rate to:178.56 cfm = 12.51 lb/min
At the specified boost levels, efficiency becomes:
7 psi (1.48 bar) 18.51 lb/min Near 65%, 68%9 psi (1.61 bar) 20.14 lb/min Near 65%, 68%14 psi (2.0 bar) 25.02 lb/min 68%
Conservatively assuming a 60% efficiency from a SR sidemount intercooler, the turbo has a total efficiency of 87.2% Assuming 138 rear wheel hp the turbo should be able to push 258.34 hp, well beyond my 180 hp initial goal and my final 200-220 hp target.
Although not great, its still a reasonable efficiency. Obviously a better solution would be to buy a bigger turbo with better efficiency, but would using this particular turbo be reasonable for my needs?