timmyk wrote:hokay...so i have a failed ka-t 1996 240sx and im sick of not being able to drive my car...so i decided to start from scratch and either swap in an sr20 or a ca18det... [canadian prices]found a sr20det redtop w/ fmic for 2300and a stock ca18det for 1500
both seem like good deals and i can't make up my mind, so i have come to those that actually own a ca, to learn from there personally experiences... here are a few questions, i have for CA owners:
1.) how reliable has it been for you?2.) would you recommend someone going ca18det on your experience or not?3.)do the few perks that the ca have, making up for the lack of power? example: there renown throttle response4.) Why did you keep your CA [or swap in] instead of getting an sr? not looking for "to be different" responses....I want legit reasons for what reasoning you have behind keeping/swaping.. Was it just easier to do?
My primary purpose for my car is drifting and I just want good throttle response and power to make some nice smoke. However, in my eyes it seems the ca18det lacks power. [From dyno/drag numbers] This is in comparision to doing small mods on an sr20 to the mods on ca18det.
What I'm trying to say, is it seems easier to extract power out of an sr20 compared to a ca18det...am I right about this? As we know, the ca lacks displacement.
Thank you for your time, and any information you can provide.
as a person who has owned both CA18DET and SR20DET as well as KA-t and RB20, i think i can help you out a little.
When my CA ran, it was as reliable as could be, i knew that every morning, id go out and it would fire right up and get me wherever i had to go. Ive had issues, but nothing to blame on the engine, its either been my or the machine shops issues over the past year that's kept the car off the road.
i would definitely recommend the CA to anyone, I really like the fact that it has no rockers made of glass like the SR does, but on the other hand, some parts can be hard to come by and are really pricey and the CA seems to be extremely finicky where the SR will take pretty much whatever you throw at it as long as you stay under 7500rpm.
the CA has great throttle response but compared to an SR, there isnt much low end, but i will say the top end grunt and rev-happy nature of the CA does make it (to me) a little more enjoyable to drive than the SR.
my true reason behind keeping my CA was that ive been there done that with the other big 3, havent exactly made big power with any one of them, but ive had fun and enjoyed them. this car is set up for the CA and its a suprise to most when they are expecting a KA or SR and they see a "mini rb" as most call it.
Every engine has its ups and downs, Ca's are good, Sr's are good. Its all in what your looking for.
If your a pure beginner, the SR seems to be the "gateway drug" of Nissan engines, I did find the SR much more forgiving to noob mistakes and ignorance, but at the same time, the CA (once unnecessary gaggle of crap is removed from it such as useless coolant lines and vacuum lines, its a pretty simple engine as well, it all comes down to parts availability if your on a budget, Sr parts are easier to come by and a little cheaper comparatively
To me, the price on the CA seems a tad high, and if that SR comes with an FMIC, i would say go with that. if your set on a CA, try to find a better deal, Jazzproparts.com for example is in Canada and has a CA priced at $1395 SHIPPED. they are who i got my SR from and their service was great.
Hope this helped.
Phil