Post by
rico05 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/rico05-u8176.html
Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 am
Didn't Rookie_CA18 (or whatever his user name is, lol) get a GReddy one to work just fine? I know it was someone on here that did it...
The top mount is to allow enough space for a larger turbo (T3 frame or larger) and the bottom mount allows you to use smaller, bolt on turbos and all of the connections (oil and coolant lines, intake tube, exhaust) to all line up. A top mount necessitates all new hardware for the turbo, and the size of the compressor means you will need substantial modifications to the fueling, control, and rotating assembly to properly support and utilize the larger turbo.
SSAC makes decent bottom mounts, but I would be afraid of their top mounts. Honestly, unless you are building a trailer queen or monster, you really have no reason to go beyond the standard manifold. On a daily driver (which sees lots of heat cycling: ie driving in traffic, short runs to the grocery store, etc), the cast stock mani would last a LOT longer than a tubular manifold readily availible here in the states. I plan to port mine (gasket match) and have it ceramic coated in the spring as opposed to the SSAC manifold I was looking into. Sure, the SSAC is cheaper (~$100, where the coating will be ~$150) and easier (have to pull the stock mani, deliver it to the shop in Houston, wait 3-5 days without my car, then reinstall) but for me, it is the better option.