ca with sohc maf about to max out on 10psi"

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
dvd
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:21 pm

Post

Hey all, I have a ca18det with a aftermarket log manifold and a gt2510. My current setup is a blowthrough SOHC maf and I have a safc2. Ever since i had the safc i noticed that the maf is always close to 90% when i'm flooring it. FOr example: while driving back from work i floored my car to 100% throttle and according to the afc at 5555rpm the maf was at 91% and turbo was boosting around 9~11psi probalby 10. Is that posssible? Or is there something wrong with my maf wiring?


kapower06
Posts: 647
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 4:36 am

Post

No its possible that the SOHC mafs is maxing out as it only reads 210whp so im not sure what that turbo is capable of, but it may be close... 210(.91)=191.1 hp. 191.1 whp is pretty easy to reach. switch to a N60 maxima MAFS they are good to 325whp. With my hybrid turbo and stage 3 chip from Horsham Developments, at 17-19psi I hit 88% 325(.88)=286.

I just so happen to have an extra N60mafs if ya want it for cheap. lemme know.

dvd
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:21 pm

Post

do you have the pigtail too?

sideways danny
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:29 pm
Car: s13, CA18DET

Post

how similar is the 240 sohc MAF to a genuine CA18DET maf? I've heard people say the CA MAF maxes at 190rwhp but I know of many many poele running it reliably way past that. I wouldn't trust the SAFC scale for the MAF limit personally

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Yea, the stock MAFS (or a SOHC) isn't hard to max out at all. If I was still running a MAFS, I be maxing it out on the stock CA T25 at 15psi. You've got a much more efficient turbo so I'm not suprised to see you're that close to maxing it out.

Pick up kapower's N60. That will give you plenty of headroom.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

It's a very slightly larger diameter. Close enough to the CA MAFS that most people can use it w/the stock ECU and not really have any issues.

User avatar
mbmbmb23
Posts: 949
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:39 pm

Post

I believe the gt2510 is good for 250hp on SR's (it's basically a ball bearing version of the stock S13SR turbo).

-m

sideways danny
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:29 pm
Car: s13, CA18DET

Post

float_6969 wrote:It's a very slightly larger diameter. Close enough to the CA MAFS that most people can use it w/the stock ECU and not really have any issues.
well I'm still using a stock CA MAF and my power grap is in the dyno sheet sticky

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Do you think the blow through setup is causing an erroneous reading? I can completely believe that the MAFS % on the SAFC is wrong.

And now that I think about it, here is a little math for everyone...

TT Z32 MAFS was used on a motor that produced 300HP in stock form. That MAFS is capable of supporting 500HP IIRC.

That means that it is oversized by a factor of 2/3's. (AKA, multiply 300 by 1.6)

If this MAFS oversizing holds true, then the CA/SOHC KA MAFS is good to right at 300HP.

I still think it's a pretty big restriction to the intake tract of the turbo, and it certainly can't hurt to use the Maxima or Z MAFS.

Liquid_Neon
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:06 pm
Car: 2000 Toyota Echo, 1988 Pulsar NX SE Turbo
Contact:

Post

what does the maxima N60 maf fall under when looking at the SAFC2? I myself have a maxima maf and was trying to find the sensor number it usues. The booklet doesnt mention maximas, just Z32's and sum other VG engine powered cars, but nothing maxima.

User avatar
rico05
Posts: 6895
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 6:52 am
Car: 1992 RMS13 w/ CA18DET
Contact:

Post

Odd. I spike to almost 1bar and I have never had an issue on my SOHC MAF. I run 12psi daily on a T25G, and had never an issue.

User avatar
davidricardo86
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:42 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

Hey kapower06, how much for a Nissan Maxima N60 MAFS w/ pigtail shipped to 60804-4114? Thanks.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

I think it's the same as an RB20 MAFS. Maybe that'll help.

User avatar
rico05
Posts: 6895
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 6:52 am
Car: 1992 RMS13 w/ CA18DET
Contact:

Post

Anyone know which MAF to select in LiveEdit for the N60 MAF? Is it close enough to the RB20 MAF to select it?

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

From what I've heard, it's the exact same thing as an RB20 MAFS.

dvd
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:21 pm

Post

nah even when it wasnt blow through setup it still had the same percentage.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

As danny said, IDK if the SAFC % can be trusted. What I suspect that is it is basically a percentage of what is supposed to be the maximum signal from the MAFS, which is 5V. What I think is that the MAFS is actually capable of more than a 5V signal and that is why the percentage is perhaps skewed.

dvd
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:21 pm

Post

maybe because I have my settings for the maf set to the ca18det's in's and out? probably no different because the sohc reads the same right?

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

No, I think it's off by 1 number from the CA MAFS. I don't know which as I've never really messed with a SAFC.

dvd
Posts: 575
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:21 pm

Post

i guess my next question is anyone with a sohc maf can tell me did they use the ca maf settings or used a ka sohc one? I'm thinkign it should be run on 5?

User avatar
TurboFortysx
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:38 am
Car: 240sx Coupe 2JZGTE

Post

I have tried three mafs,the CA, SR, and KA. The best one I got to work was the CA maf which maxed out at 330 rwhp at 14 lbs.

Liquid_Neon
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:06 pm
Car: 2000 Toyota Echo, 1988 Pulsar NX SE Turbo
Contact:

Post

any one know if the DE and DET mafs are the same? ill check my de part number when i get a chance.


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”