Post by
Didderson »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/didderson-u38557.html
Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:07 pm
You've got some good points there Dano. I agree you probably don't see as much improvement with this as with a rear strut bar, but I have a cheapo ebay strut bar that came w/ my car when purchased so I have yet to improve on that mod.
As far as the strength of these bars goes I'm not sure about them being weak. Sure they are weak as hell under shear forces like bending, but my friend mrgreeneyes had one on his old hatch, the car hit a pole sideways in the rear (not his fault, his idiot friend was driving) and the bar actually transferred the force of the tree to the other side, bending the c pillar outwards! It was quite a sight. He might have pics of the busted up car on here. So in terms of tension and compression, which is all the bar is designed for, I think it works fine.
I was assuming it's only under tension because of this theory: http://www.e30m3performance.co...y.htm
I forget who did the math for it, but it's a common thing if you search the internet some physicist did calculations.
On a side note, mrgreeneyes doesn't want to run a strut tower bar for the rear of his s13 coupe. I said he should but he says nah because the coupe framing is much better. But in my argument I stated that the framing actually isn't connected to the tower, making his point void but who knows. Did you notice a pretty nice difference w/ a strut brace on your car? He put his battery between the struts so we'll have to get a slightly higher bar for this to work.
lol a clothing rack. that's a good idea. now i can move out and live in my car finally
Modified by Didderson at 9:23 PM 2/18/2008