wat u tryin 2 say, ese?Axel Grungy wrote:14" -20 cholo style
Absolutely not. A 1.5 inch stagger would be murder on the understeer-prone 240, and if you MUST stagger, the rear offset should be higher to make up for the width so the wheels sit the same.turbo2nr wrote:i love those rims to they are my dream rims, i would go with 17x8 +22 and 17x9.5+15.. with a gangsta roll out back. those rims are the sex...
zenkii wrote:^
Not on an S13.Kouki Chick wrote:The closer to 0 and the further away from 45 the better
The ideal fitment without needing spacers to be flush would be..17x9+15and 17x10+25
Bingo! I'm glad somebody said it before I could.SeVa-S13 wrote:
Not on an S13.
Edit: Oh, and for the love of god, SEARCH. This has been covered almost as many times as an SR vs KA debate...
An S13 fits that easily with an hour of work.SeVa-S13 wrote:
Not on an S13....
I disagree. I wouldnt say 17x10's are an easy fit by any means. Not everyone wants to take the risk of buckling their quarter panels to fit wheels that are bigger than necesary. Plus, those sizes arent even in his list of options anyways.sensibleS13driver wrote:
An S13 fits that easily with an hour of work.
I've got 8.5 +25 all the way around on my s13. They do not stick out past the fenders, but they aren't sunken by any means either. Rolling the fenders depends on what kind of suspension setup you're running and how low you are. I had to roll the rears, but not the fronts.bobbyhill wrote:would you have to roll the fenders and will they stick out the fenders
so your saying sr vs ka is ka more boost but rod throwage?SeVa-S13 wrote:
Not on an S13.
Edit: Oh, and for the love of god, SEARCH. This has been covered almost as many times as an SR vs KA debate...