flohtingPoint wrote:NJ will be a snoozefest unless it gets an atrocious amount of rain. F1 cars outgrew street circuits a couple decades ago.
lol just barely VA...alms24sebring wrote:+1 for VA
There are a number of American road courses I'd love to see F1 on (Infineon being #1), the problem though is that none of the tracks have proper facilities to support GP2 race, let alone F1.Bubba1 wrote:flohtingPoint wrote:NJ will be a snoozefest unless it gets an atrocious amount of rain. F1 cars outgrew street circuits a couple decades ago.
I dunno, we are talking northern NJ, so avoiding potholes might prove entertaining..... "Yo Boinee, you godda problem wi' dat?"
I'd love to see F1 cars on VIR's full course.
Unfortunately, Infineon is located on the wrong side of the country for me. Seriously, I think Watkins Glen, would have been the logical US GP site due to its F1 history and it's size. But I can't see Bernie slumming at the ol' Seneca Lodge...flohtingPoint wrote: There are a number of American road courses I'd love to see F1 on (Infineon being #1), the problem though is that none of the tracks have proper facilities to support GP2 race, let alone F1.
It's only popular because of the principality it's located in, the race itself is always less of a race, more of a procession of cars. The last time something exciting happened at Monaco it didnt even involve racing, it was when Schmacher parked his Ferrari at rascasse and all the fallout from it. I honestly cannot tell you the last time the race was entertaining.Bubba1 wrote:But as far as F1 outgrowing street circuits decades ago, I must disagree. Monaco is a street course and still remains among the most popular and coveted races in F1. Plus the fact that Bernie is looking even looking at a street course in Weehauken should indicate F1 has not outgrown them.
From what I was hearing here in Austin (I really don't care about F1 racing) is that the contract signed with the state said that the Austin race would be the first US race. Then they announced a NJ race which may occur before the Texas race. This in essence breached contract and the comptroller decided to withhold funds. Here is a link to the letter that F1 received:Bubba1 wrote:I dont recall seeing anyone bring it up, but it appears Austin might lose the US Grand Prix. Bernie is demanding a $25million extor...er..licensing fee (for Austin's honor of hosting his race) in advance of the race.
The $25million was supposed to come out of a Texas major events development fund and be paid July 31st, but State Comptroller, Susan Combs, evidently not an F1 fan, announced Texas will not pay Bernie until they see the event happen. My guess Bernie wants that cash to help pay for theAaron Spelling mansion he bought for his hot daughter.
I understand construction has stopped on the $250 million facility which resulted in the layoff of some 300 workers. It's possible NJ might end up hosting the only US GP.
Thoughts?
just read that too. Appears Ms.Combs finally paid Bernie his sanctioning fee. Looks like the race is on to get the facility built in time.sivartk wrote:Just heard on the news today that F1 has found the cash and the race (and track build) is back on. Might have to check this out next November....assuming it gets completed on time.