Broadfield, JL 6W3?
-
the converted
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:14 am
- Car: '99 BMW M3 6.0
'88 Toyota Celica All-Trac (somewhere in Cali)
'20 Toyota Tacoma - Location: Boston
Broadfield, JL 6W3?
I know you deal with JL so I figured I'd ask this at you. I have the 6W0's right now and I do like them. 6W3's that much better?
-
the converted
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:14 am
- Car: '99 BMW M3 6.0
'88 Toyota Celica All-Trac (somewhere in Cali)
'20 Toyota Tacoma - Location: Boston
Re: (EW)
the 6w0's were awesome subs in the right enclosure. People think I have 10's.
-
Broadfield
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:57 pm
- Car: 1992 240sx
- Location: Normal, IL
- Contact:
Re: Broadfield, JL 6W3? (the converted)
Well, I can't really make a good comparison, because I never had a customer buy any of the 6W0's. With that being said, the 6W3's are MEAN!
The W3 will be better pretty much all around. Better control, higher excursion, lower distortion, twice if not three times the power handling, much better design technology. All of JL's newer woofers and mid range drivers use their proprietary DMA technology. The W0 was too old to benefit from this.
The W3 will be better pretty much all around. Better control, higher excursion, lower distortion, twice if not three times the power handling, much better design technology. All of JL's newer woofers and mid range drivers use their proprietary DMA technology. The W0 was too old to benefit from this.