BREAKING NEWS!!!! New GTR pics are up!!!

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
gabossie
Posts: 9632
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 7:03 am
Car: Your mom
Contact:

Post

I want some REAL ****ING PICTURES AND SPECS THOUGH!


sensibleS13driver
Posts: 3012
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 7:20 am

Post

it says videos coming soon I can't wait!

One_Love
Posts: 8921
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:56 pm
Car: 1995 nissan 240sx

Post

i wanna read the interview

naed240sx
Posts: 4400
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:15 am
Car: .....

Post

gabossie wrote:I want some REAL ****ING PICTURES AND SPECS THOUGH!


wow. Thats car p0rn if ive ever seen it. That thing is gorgeous. I love the use of carbon fiber in the grill, and how the kept the muscular, angled look of the r34, blended with the tasteful g35. I love you Nissan.

Shift_Tommy
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:35 pm
Car: Nissan 240sx

Post

would have been better if it had specs on the car...

User avatar
scs13
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 6:08 am
Car: 93 s13 coupe

Post

how come it doesnt work when i look at it, it just says this

User avatar
Thrwnsprkz
Posts: 1057
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 2:40 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

looks good... i like the rear alot, very fitting

i think the cars slanted back too far and i dought that low roofline will make production

classy, the front is growing on my quicky... im glad the "eyeliner run" is CF and not black plastic or something, cleans it up a lil bit

& yes...... I waited untill 2:45 AM for the countdown to Zero and the pix to come up

vvaffle
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:29 pm
Car: 1991 240sx base hatch, 2009 WRX

Post

refresh the page after the countdown.

I like it alot. The roof line is dead sexy. It slopes perfectly into the windshield and the trunk lid. The shoulder line is great and quite muscular. Back end looks simpler and in my opinion better than the r34. The front wheel fenders blend perfectly into the headlights and the shoulder line. And I do like the headlights, they are almost mean looking. I also like the fact that the front bumper is fairly simple without any unnecessary lines. As you may notice, I want to have sex with this car. Now what I would REALLY like, is for similar but not identical styling to be applied to a new, lighter, RWD, S chassis car (I know this won't happen)

my favorite picture. great profile with short overhangs.

I will beg on my knees for them to keep the low roofline. I hate when a sports car tries to be "practical."

User avatar
scs13
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 6:08 am
Car: 93 s13 coupe

Post

ive refreshed the page 13.7 million times and its still the same thing.

User avatar
scs13
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 6:08 am
Car: 93 s13 coupe

Post

nvm, i tried it on IE instead of mozilla and it worked. weird. i was hoping there would be some actual info on the car, but the pictures are dead sexy.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Front fenders are too busy. They look like some kid in his garage tacked them on. They also interrupt the beltline and shoulders.

The blacked out a-pillar reminds me of the old Mercury Sable and Dodge Intrepid. In the 90s they were cheesy. They still are.

The rear is a big but muscular slab with big round tail lights, just like the C5 and C6 Corvettes.

The roof? It makes the top of the car look like Pac Man. It does slope nicely to the rear, however.

I could write hundreds of pages on the front, but I'll keep it simple: It looks cheap.

I previously reserved my styling critiques because it was just a concept, but now that the concept has become a final product with few changes, I think its hideous. The whole damn car is trying too hard to impress, like a fatty with too much makeup.

Thankfully it won't perform like a fatty. I can't wait to see it in action.

User avatar
JimmyMethod
Posts: 6450
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:18 pm
Car: 97' 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

CHRISTMAS CAME EARLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seriously, I feel like dancing...Wow...that thing looks amazing...I'm gonna be a serial test driver at any nearby Nissan dealership that gets one (until I can afford it...)

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Someone at Miata.net cleaned it up:

SeanDean
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 11:30 pm
Car: V8S13, 528i, 328is racecar

Post

vvaffle wrote:refresh the page after the countdown.

I like it alot. The roof line is dead sexy. It slopes perfectly into the windshield and the trunk lid. The shoulder line is great and quite muscular. Back end looks simpler and in my opinion better than the r34. The front wheel fenders blend perfectly into the headlights and the shoulder line. And I do like the headlights, they are almost mean looking. I also like the fact that the front bumper is fairly simple without any unnecessary lines. As you may notice, I want to have sex with this car. Now what I would REALLY like, is for similar but not identical styling to be applied to a new, lighter, RWD, S chassis car (I know this won't happen)

my favorite picture. great profile with short overhangs.

I will beg on my knees for them to keep the low roofline. I hate when a sports car tries to be "practical."
Check out the Nissan Foria, it is almost certain to be the next Silvia and shares quite a bit in proportions and lines with the GT-R Proto. Judging from that long hood I would guess it's packing some QR variant.



And check out http://www.seriouswheels.com/t...t.htmfor lots more pics. The Foria is being displayed alongside the GT-R proto. Mark my words the Foria is the next S-chassis

scs13: Try setting Mozilla to check for a new version of webpages every time you visit them.

-Sean

gabossie
Posts: 9632
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 7:03 am
Car: Your mom
Contact:

Post

Gotta say, the photochop looks better! It also makes it look a little Mazda-e. I think the profile view is SPECTACULAR, I'm just still not sold on the front. I look foreward to other colors.

naed240sx
Posts: 4400
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:15 am
Car: .....

Post

gabossie wrote:Gotta say, the photochop looks better! It also makes it look a little Mazda-e. I think the profile view is SPECTACULAR, I'm just still not sold on the front. I look foreward to other colors.
The photochop one looks way too much like a celica. This car deserves to have one of a kind styling. Leave it be.

User avatar
Nexus9
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 am
Car: R33 GTST VSpec Skyline

Post


User avatar
Nexus9
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 am
Car: R33 GTST VSpec Skyline

Post


User avatar
Nexus9
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 am
Car: R33 GTST VSpec Skyline

Post

let the photo-chops begin

w1ngzer0
Posts: 7535
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 7:49 pm
Car: Pfft. i don't own a box
Contact:

Post

You guys whine to much. It looks bad ***, period.


Modified by w1ngzer0 at 8:45 PM 8/23/2006

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Wow, thats freaking hot in black.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:Front fenders are too busy. They look like some kid in his garage tacked them on. They also interrupt the beltline and shoulders.
I agree. The "widebody" look is just stupid. If you're going to "vent" from the front fenders, do it minimally and tastefully, a la C5/C6 Corvette or FD.
Jesda wrote:The blacked out a-pillar reminds me of the old Mercury Sable and Dodge Intrepid. In the 90s they were cheesy. They still are.
Hey, at least this one is glossy and lends to a wraparound greenhouse.I don't mind it, but I'd prefer it was body colored. To me, it throws the visual weight of the car off.
Jesda wrote:The rear is a big but muscular slab with big round tail lights, just like the C5 and C6 Corvettes.
I HATE that. It screams "Rubbermaid." At least the C6 and GT-R proto have black along the bottom to break it up. Also, fortunately, the GT-R's trunk lid seam cuts into it, breaking up the massive blank slab.
Jesda wrote:The roof? It makes the top of the car look like Pac Man. It does slope nicely to the rear, however.
As I've said before: Big C-pillars are BAD! Drive a murano or a new Maxima for a day and you'll know what I mean. Backing up and changing lanes is a beast, because you just can't see anything behind the rear windows on either side... And big c-pillars combined with low, sloping backlight are even worse. Yeah, it needs to look sporty, but I hate it when looks get in the way of function. They should do something like the new charger, with a sloping roof/backlight/c-pillars, but lower-profile "machine-gun-nest" windows. It lends a lot to the sleekness of the car, kills the pac-look, and lets you combine a clean roofline with good visibility.
Jesda wrote:I could write hundreds of pages on the front, but I'll keep it simple: It looks cheap.
Bare CF is just stupid. It is. It's like having bare sheet metal. Yeah...we know it's there. Whupty ****. I really dislike how far back the lenses continue on the upper fender surface. It's one of those "looks this way because it'll get recognized" design things. But--this car doesn't NEED that. It's one of the most anticipated cars of the modern era. It'd get noticed if it looked like a 1995 Ford Taurus.The headlights should be completely on the vertical surface of the fascia, helping to alleviate some of the emptiness that is now being filled in with idiot carbon fiber.Also, the front is a stark contrast to the rest of the car. The whole of the body flows down and back. But the front is over-vertical. It looks like it was taken from a completely different car.

My only other real gripe is that the wheels have one too many spokes. 5 or 6 spoke wheels are the most attractive, IMHO, especially with thick, convex spokes like these. Something like the new Z33 5-spokes would look excellent on this car. 7 spokes are just too busy. They belong on a luxury model like the G35, not on a sports car like the GT-R

User avatar
gniknave
Posts: 4761
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:25 pm
Car: 2000 Audi A6 2.8 Quattro
2008 Honda Civic EX (Sedan)
Location: Newport, Kentucky

Post

I care less how it looks. Let me drive. Hell I drive a Q45 and there's plenty of critics for the looks of that car

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Ev_eezy wrote:Hell I drive a Q45 and there's plenty of critics for the looks of that car
Which is why we should re-legalize lobotomies.

lrb_2000
Posts: 2854
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:41 pm
Car: '91 Nissan KA-T hatch
Contact:

Post

lol... I think it looks pretty lame.. nothing about it looks good, well, maybe the wheels...it looks like a 350z got rear ended by a corvette and smashed by a new mustang lol... . of course they have to ruin the car before it comes here... but that's just my opinion, because i'll never be able to afford one, and if I could, I would definitely get an R32 GTR or R34 GTR.. I just hope they don't put a v8 or v6 in it.. they need to at least stick with an I-6..



http://www3.stream.co.jp/web06...b.asx
Modified by lrb_2000 at 6:01 AM 10/19/2005

Scooby24
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:30 am
Car: 01 BMW 330CI

Post

I just called Nissan and pre-ordered one.

I plan on winning the powerball tonight.

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

Jesda wrote:Someone at Miata.net cleaned it up:
Can somebody do another photoshop of the silver front photo that Jesda posted..

Keep the center grill the stock carbon fiber.. but silver the area underneath each headlight like a normal cars bumper. Then drop a carbon fiber hood on it!

I think that is my only complaint with the whole car... I don't like the lines going so vertical on the front bumper.


User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

w00t, that's awesome.

So it's finally here. I actually really like the design, although I wish the tail-lights were just normal circles instead of having those little patterns in them.

It's still a proto, after all, so I think some of the more avantgarde touches will likely be cleaned up for the production model. I'd like to see the interior.

Do we have specs yet? Are the going to go with the electrically assisted turbochargers?

NISTECH
Posts: 10585
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 4:17 am

Post

MOD yes the Z is getting a new VQ in 07, the 3.7L posted after your post seems to be a popular number lately due to a Japanese car mag so I am thinking thats the new VQ they mentioned when I was at one of NNA's facilities.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54547
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Looks like Nissan hit the ball outta the park.

...did I mention we had the pics up 4 hours before the countdown was over?

Time to liquidate my 401K and the kids ain't going to college - Daddy wants a GTR.


Return to “General Chat”