BREAKING: Carlos Ghosn to step down as CEO of Nissan

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

Source: Autoblog
Carlos Ghosn announced he will be stepping down as CEO of the Nissan on April 1, to be replaced by current Nissan co-CEO Hiroto Saikawa. The move comes after close to two decades of leadership and the rebuilding of a company that was close to disaster. Ghosn isn't finished with the company he helped rebuild, as he will will remain on as chairman of the board and continue on as leader of the Renault-Nissan Alliance following the change of guard.

In addition to running Renault-Nissan, Ghosn has taken over as chairman of Mitsubishi Motors after acquiring a 34-percent stake in 2016, a move he spearheaded. Ghosn stated, "I am confident that the management team I have developed at Nissan over the past 18 years has the talent and experience to meet the company's operational and strategic goals. Having recently taken on new responsibilities at Mitsubishi Motors, and taking into consideration the upcoming Nissan general shareholders meeting, I have decided that the time is right for Hiroto Saikawa to succeed me as Nissan's CEO."
Definitely end of an era, but I don't expect too many changes to Nissan's direction in the near future.


lne937s
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:30 pm
Car: 2012 Nissan Juke SL AWD

Post

Hopefully he can get a little sleep now. Chairing 3 companies and the being Chair/CEO of the Alliance is really enough for one person. Trying to be CEO of all of them as well is too much to ask of one human being.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Boy, my feelings on the situation are a lot different than I'm seeing in this thread. Haha.

I've never ever been a Ghosn fan. Ever. I know he saved a dying brand, but I honestly think it's more of a zombie now. It might not be dead but it sure isn't alive, and I think dying with a solid legacy would have been no worse than turning into what it has become. Every meaningful nameplate the brand makes except GTR and Z has been diluted and overlapped and softened to the point of purposelessness, and even those two have been seriously neglected for far too long and are in desperate need of updates. I don't like the way he runs companies (something I studied extensively shortly after the Nissan/Renault purchase) and I despise his focus on sales volume over product quality and design. He may be a successful businessman but most people who qualify for that title these days are boring as Hell and run their companies the same way. But I am thrilled to see him handing off the CEO hat to someone else. If nothing else, hopefully this will at least mean Nissan will start to act like a Japanese automaker again instead of a French one.

What I am very interested in is the future of Mitsubishi. Why? Because I hate it so much at the same time that I don't care about it at all. The brand is so meaningless that an attempt at a resurrection can only lead to interesting things. Either it dies or it actually starts to matter, and both of those are a huge step forward from where the brand has been for the past 25 years.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

I think gaining Mitsu as an automaker wasn't the point. Gaining Mitsu means gaining additional parts streams, manufacturing facilities, and connections.

Hell, they ceased to be relevant as an automaker well over a decade ago.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Mitsubishi is big on trucks and commercial vehicles. They're basically irrelevant for passenger cars.

I'm mostly curious about what this means for Infiniti, a soulless brand that makes a couple great cars.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

fwiw: Mitsubishi trucks (or "Fuso") seems to have a similar reputation as their cars in the US market. Cheaply made, cheaply priced, and trouble prone.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

Bubba1 wrote:Cheaply made, cheaply priced, and trouble prone.
while i can agree with the first two, i have experienced and heard quite the opposite of the third.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

I've been driving non-cdl trucks part time for a used truck dealer for few years, and have driven a bunch of Fusos. (too many) They're fragile compared to Isuzu or Hino (Toyota) and always seem have annoying problems.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

AZhitman wrote:I think gaining Mitsu as an automaker wasn't the point. Gaining Mitsu means gaining additional parts streams, manufacturing facilities, and connections.

Hell, they ceased to be relevant as an automaker well over a decade ago.
Yeah, you're right. I think that was actually the official statement when the purchase was made as well.

I certainly hope it trickles down into an improvement in the worlds most pointless automaker, though.

Lowes11
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 5:34 am
Car: 2010 Nissan Rogue SL

Post

So many ways to look at this. I do feel like Nissan has dropped the ball lately. I don't care for the CVT at all. I still have two Nissans and one Dodge. I am looking forward to better options in the future for Nissan. Looking forward to the new Frontier!

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Hard to believe Mitsu USA was a brand that once claimed to be representative of emotion.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MuYLiFClb0[/youtube]

User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

Jesda wrote:Hard to believe Mitsu USA was a brand that once claimed to be representative of emotion.
Still is. It's just that the emotion it represents now is drowsiness and indifference.... :rotfl

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Ghosn took a dead company and brought it back to life. There is a word for that, necromancy. Just like all zombies it's a shambling, decaying monster that reminds you less and less of what it used to be every year. This, frankly, isn't gone enough for me. I'm driving a Ford because of the direction this idiot took the company.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Others have stated my opinion on this pretty well already. While he "saved" Nissan, it's just a soulless, mindless, boring-mobile factory now. The only exciting cars it makes, the GTR and Z34, are LOONG overdue for ground up re-vamps. I have little hope that Nissan will ever make all of their vehicles exciting like they used to.

User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

I'm down to 1 Nissan. have had a good list of them over the years including a 240Z, a pair of 280ZXTs, a Z31, Sentra, Xterra, Frontier, and 2 Muranos. Only my 370Z remains. Just watched my Frontier drive away last weekend after almost 19 years.

Nissan's new lineup is boring. The only two interesting vehicles they have are very aged without a refresh, and are available in ridiculously low volumes. Their trucks are dead to me now. Nissan's refusal to refresh their product line makes vehicles that were once great die off. First the Pathfinder turned into a stupid CVT car, The Frontier is unchanged since 2005. They killed off the Xterra. The Titan went WAY too long without a refresh, and the new one is boring and not selling because it's priced through the roof.

Yeah, Nissan can pretty much get bent. American stuff is much more interesting these days.


Return to “General Chat”