Difficult to beat OEM rotors with OEM pads and OEM specification Michelins (no longer available).Kiven422 wrote:Don't they have better stopping distances and a LOT less brake dust?
I think you are missing the point about the ppositive correlation to brake pad dust and cold stop performance.SanDY33go wrote: i mainly just cruise my car on weekends and go out for only short trips. something thats better than OEM and gives less brake dust since i hate having to always wipe down my wheels after driving.
bullittandy wrote:......Either you have brake pads that do not create dust and suffer from long stopping distances (which would be difficult to notice) or some other performance problem like a soft pedal. Or you have great performance with lots of dust.
I've had Napa's Raybestos ceramic pads on my Q for 25k miles and over 2 years- the pre-NICO era for me. They are excellent pads and actually cost a few $$ more than OEM. I've made many drives into the Sierras (fishing) on roads that would warp most Chinese-made rotors and have your brakes fading as you drift wide on a curve at the top of a 1500 foot cliff.Kiven422 wrote:What about Ceramic pads? Don't they have better stopping distances and a LOT less brake dust?
Ding, Ding, Ding!!! Great answer! I have ceramic pads and they are great! Since you probably drive like me (cruise, not trying to race a ricer) one you put you wheels on, these pads are the way to go, especially if you have chrome wheels. Andy, how much are you trying to sell the pads for? Are they new, what brand?goody94q45 wrote:
I'm not saying they wear better or brake better than OEM but I agree with Andy that the difference is not noticeable. I've made plenty of panic stops in the last 25,000 miles (most involving drivers using cell phones BTW) and never rear-ended anyone so I think they're working pretty good......and zero brake dust as a bonus!