i noticed it too. hopefully it's just the angle of the picture.WDRacing wrote:The intake runners don't look port matched to the flange???
I don't understand... The company is called boost designs but this manifold is made for an NA setup?madbouncy wrote:*drools* can't wait for the dyno. And to think people were complaining and yelling at boost designs a month ago. Man, between the aem ems, this new intake, and the upcoming release of all the internals, the NA ka's might be able to start breaking the 200's a lot easier. Not as good as ITB's but definitly cheaper and easier.
Are you serious?!?!?!?!?madbouncy wrote:I'm pertty sure it's made for either, not like it matters which you use it on.
Yes, but in his defence even a intake manifold designed for NA setups would flow better under boost than the stock one...but your exactly right, there's huge difference in the needs of both designs...this one looks to be a more generic design but more NA then Boost specfic, just compare this one to Phat-KAT's manifold...MarkEmark wrote:
Are you serious?!?!?!?!?
There's quite a few considerable differences between an intake manifold designed for natural aspiration and one designed for forced induction...
Yes, but it's a lot different boosting an OEM N/A intake manifold which has been designed for a good, somewhat compromised, powerband all around, and using an intake manifold DESIGNED solely for boost for a naturally-aspirated application. Most people buying an aftermarket intake manifold for a KA-T are those people who already have a laundry list of modifications to their engine (fully built), are boosting quite a bit, have excellent fuel management, and are already making some serious power.... and, short of turning up the boost anymore (perhaps they are at the max boost for their fuel system), there's no way they can make any more power. You won't see many people with these expensive, very nice intake manifolds who are only boosting 8 psi...I Need $$$ wrote:Stock intake manifold was made for NA but there are people boosting on that and making considerable amounts of power. Maybe I shouldn't be the one to say that since I am still stock but I figured I would just put in my .02 cents.
Redline pretty much said what i was thinking. I didn't mean to try and say that an NA and tubro manifold are the same. But I think both will benefit from a better intake manifold. You can just look at the BD manifold and tell it's not exactly the most flowing manifold. Like red said, compare it to the kat manifold and you can tell it's not made to be nearly as good, hence why it's giong to be a lot cheaper. Also, nothing's been said about the TB so I assume BD will be using the stock one, where as KAT's is using a larger one. It's like exhaust, it helps to go bigger than stock for na and turbo, you just need to be more careful with na about going too big.MarkEmark wrote:Are you serious?!?!?!?!?
There's quite a few considerable differences between an intake manifold designed for natural aspiration and one designed for forced induction...