NightRiderQ45 wrote:Steve, you always provide great answers. Why don't you visit the Q45 forum once in awhile? I have an a/c problem/question I would love for you to view there. Thanks!
If you have any questions you want another opinion you can email me. I admittedly do not frequent the Q forum as my time gets thin sometimes. And the kids have taken over there. Technically the Q forum is by far the forum with the most technically inclined members. I will peek in there more frequently though. Thanks for the heads up.
szhosain wrote:
Normally, I would agree with you. On my older Q45's, the BGB-44K did not do much at all ... even at high miles on the car situations.
On my 2003 M45 though, it has definitely helped. With a light foot on the car (like when my wife drives it), it tends to build up carbon deposits over time. The Infiniti TSB on this issue recommends: a few high sustained WOT rev's on the road (i.e., not without load), and if that does not "work", followed by a treatment using their Nissan equivalent of BG-44K.
So, I have done this and it has definitely fixed problems - within a quarter-tank of putting it in. Dramatic changes from stumbling, poor engine performance, all the way to normal operation. In my current 75k miles of driving the M45, I think I have used about 5 or 6 cans of BG-44K (one time was the Nissan equivalent). With exactly the same improvement each time.
Z
For some reason the VK upto ~06 (Q45 only) and 04M uses the old school simple setup, which may have some improvement for slower (lower revs) drivers that tend to develop carbon deposits as part of normal combustion. Honestly the Y35 is an old Q when it comes to its the basics. The newer cars that have more control over ignition and valve timing offer a more complete burn. Also things like fuel sending units have been designed so they no longer use a strainer at the lowest point in the tank keeping sludge and debris from clogging the filter holes. I think a strong example of this is the new (06+) models do not use external fuel filters. Even after a hundred thirty+ thousand mile car the screens are pretty clean.
The biggest issue I see in any of these cars is oil buildup in or around the intake from the PCV. I do not think it is to the point that a catch can is needed but instead of that I recommend removing and cleaning the intake, the differences noticed by that will far exceed anything a chemical spray cleaner can safely remove (think about where all that sludge goes??? Catalysts...yep and carbon does not burn off easily and effects the operating temperatures). In cars that exceed 8/80k (federal emissions warranty) I would advise against that do the fact that the VK catalytic converter and manifold assembly costs almost $2000 and they can be destroyed very quickly with an ignition missfire or something else that will cause combustible materials to enter the honeycomb mesh inside the cat. The result of this is a firing off of the cats that cause them to overheat (a glowing or burning smell will be noticed) and soon enough you have a P0420 and/or P0430 to greet you after a short highway trip.
In some older cars things like these cleaners work well, if there is already a significant amount of carbon (Poyzinous' dads old machine) 44k may be able to dent that. Nothing though will ever beat a thorough deep cleaning. The problem with that service is you cannot recommend something like this to people, as the labor required to do this correctly is excessive, although it is not going into our pockets. I have done this 3 times in the last few months (a G, Qby4, and Q) and the outcome results were great, this allows you replace PCVs or any wearable part that may show signs of wear. If it were financially feasible to give us a budget and what you want out of the car someone out there can correctly perform this fairly intensive task. Going through and doing a massive thorough cleaning every 10/100 ish or as needed will do more for the overall success of your car over time.
sorry to rant, just my thoughts after a long day of G Convertable new model training.