Chingon wrote:It didn't impact the US sport market like the 240z, but I do think it has more credit for starting the import revolution than the z (which was the argument).
The Japanese economy was strengthening, and with it, the desire to drive something more exciting than the traditional, spartan Japanese automobile. This new attitude by Toyota was reflected first in 1967, with the 2000GT, a swoopy sports car built for Toyota by Yamaha. Featured in a contemporary James Bond film, the 2000GT, with its DOHC inline-6, would later become the inspiration for the Supra (the 2000GT name was also used on later Japanese Celicas and Supras) . As a sidenote, the legendary Datsun 240Z appeared in the same time frame, and may actually have been designed on the same concept as the 2000GT.
This car was simply the most awe-inspiring machine that anyone had seen from Japan, full stop. Engineers thoroughly tested the 2000GT in various racing venues from 1965 to 1967 before finally offering the car to the general public in May of 1967. The car performed admirably, shattering 11 international racing records including one in which the 2000GT averaged 206.18km/h for 10,000miles and 72 hours.
Of course i'm aware the z has just as many or more credentials to it's name, but this one came 1st..
'67 2000gt...like scc said, "so scarce that they only change hands when a billionaire dies" Unless they decide to get buried w/it
I agree with your explanation about the 2000GT's influence of the modern Japanese sports car, and that it was an striking, awesome car, but we're talking about two different issues. My issue, was if you compare apples to apples and the US market, the 240Z had a far bigger impact than the 2000GT as the Z was affordable, mass produced, sold by the thousands in the US, and drastically improved Datsun/nissan's image here. The 2000GT, on the other hand, was expensive, exotic and unavailable in this country.
I believe you're saying the 2000gt had a bigger influence with Japanese sports car design than the Fairlady (240Z). I agree, but as far as a direct impact in THIS country compared to the 240Z, I disagree. It's a matter of perspective. While the 2000gt was revolutionary to the Japanese in terms of styling, the 2000GT's styling was actually very evolutionary as it was borrowed heavily from the European designers like Pinin Farina or Bertone, who were already selling cars in the US. In fact, it might have been designed by a Eruopean, I don't remember. But unlike the 240z, the 2000GT was aimed at the better european sports cars of its day, (much like the NSX when it first came out), while the Z was marketed directly at the young middle class US buyer (who had been buying MG's, Triumphs, and Fiats).
In the US, and in terms of the "bestest" NISSAN ever, I still say the 240Z is the choice, not the Toyota 2000gt. (note the word Toyota... just kidding) As far as the "bestest" Toyota? IMHO it was the humble Corona. The Corona launched Toyota's success in this country and drastically altered the US perception of cheap japanese cars. The Corona was far more influential in the US than the exotic 2000GT.