just think if it was clinton therecmfireman wrote:Another good one...
Anyone want to play "spot the secret service" in this picture?cmfireman wrote:Another good one...
That myth was debunked two years ago at snopes. Please don't perpetuate falsehoods.skylndrftr wrote:lets just hope he knows what hes doing and doesn't get her flipped upside down...like he does with childrens books
Good info, thanks! Digital photo editing capabilities are going to make this issue a big deal as the software gets better and better ...srellim234 wrote:That myth was debunked two years ago at snopes. Please don't perpetuate falsehoods.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/bushbook.asp
damn...I guess you can't believe everything you read on the internetsrellim234 wrote:That myth was debunked two years ago at snopes. Please don't perpetuate falsehoods.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/bushbook.asp
Error fixed!rn79870 wrote:Why is it we love Bushisms so very much. We already know the man is human, therefore to err is to be expected. I'll miss these when GW retires next year.
You are as anal about these as I am.Marenta wrote:Error fixed!
I really can't help it. I swear to god I'm OCD about it. I have to edit other people's posts if I use it in a quote. My brain shuts down if there's typos of any kind, spelling, punctuation, grammar.. you name it.szhosain wrote:You are as anal about these as I am.
named.Marenta wrote:there's typos
Fixed again.Marenta wrote:Why is it we love Bushisms so very much?
...if there ARE typos. (gotcha! )Marenta wrote:
... if there's typos ...
Yep, those liberals are always hitting on young male pages, meeting men in public restrooms, and giving gay prostitutes special access to the WH. All while trying to pass anti-gay legislation.audtatious wrote:You mad cuz he aint looking at the men? That would be the liberal thing for him to do