If you've never been to court before I wholeheartedly recommend hiring a lawyer. You can go in without a lawyer and win, I’ve done it a dozen times for speeding tickets citing terrain error, lack of tracking history, panning error, look past error etc… But despite all of my self-representation in traffic court when I got a ticket four years ago in North Carolina I hired a lawyer and it was some of the best money I ever spent. No time out of my workday for court, no sitting around and just waiting in court, no time out of my personal life to request information as part of the discovery process (speedometer and radar calibrations, tuning fork accuracy, radar operator certification) and review the information provided. But most of all, despite my firm belief I could avoid the ticket I wasn’t familiar with a particular judge’s courtroom procedures and the last thing I wanted to happen was to look like some uppity yankee trying to tell Southerners how things were done. I paid an attorney $250 plus court costs and was happy about experiencing no hassle and enjoying the fact that zero points that got added to my license.
Your other option is to see if traffic school is an option and save the lawyer for a "rainy day".
C-Kwik wrote:Doubtful it would work. Regardless of if your speedometer is working or not, you are still required to drive at a speed that is safe for the conditions. Generally, speed limits are statistical approximations of what the basic speed law is for that section of roadway. A faulty speedometer argument might be an argument that might be considered if you were just over the limit, but 14 over and at nearly 80 mph, I doubt any judge will be anything but annoyed by that argument. Short of weeing if the officer fails to show or if the judge might offer a lower fine and less points, you realy need to have a solid argument (using solid facts) for a judge to consider dismissing the ticket.
It worked for me. That ticket four years ago was for 78 in a 60 and it was reduced to "Improper Equipment" (a non-moving violation) in NC thanks to a non-working HUD on my S13. I was going nowhere near that speed, told the traffic lawyer the same thing but he knew that the non-working speedo was a far better defense than the "wrong car" defense.
And fwiw, I've actually used the "safe speed for conditions" once as a defense on an empty, low traffic road and had it work when I didn't have any other option for a defense, but it would
never be my first choice.