You sure they wont get you KA bearings then if you provide the VIN for your american car? Thinking you are an idiot for ordering bearings for some random engine? Sounds like a bad mistake waiting to happen.float_6969 wrote:
Right now I'm waiting on another Nissan dealer. He said if I could get him a VIN, they could upgrade the order to a "customer care order"?
If this doesn't work out, I have a few more avenues to pursue. We'll see if it comes to that.Ron240sx wrote:You know whats funny? I wondered if those bearings were yours. I even told the guy id pay a higher price. No deal. As for customer care order? Idk for certain. I use to work for a nissan dealership as a tech up until a couple months back. Youll have to let me know asap on that. I dont understand why japan couldnt be contacted?? Id think with multiple cars equipped with a CA of some sort there would have to be plenty over there. Versus our 88 nissan pulsar.
I need some bearings. Im sure you know the feeling? I read you were using clevite 77s prior? Whats the deal with those? Didnt they work well for your engine?
Im tellin you man, japan has to have a stock pile of them. But how do we get ahold of them?
When I ordered the bearings, I gave them the PN I wanted. They emailed me back asking for the VIN. I responded telling them I had a swapped motor and that the VIN of my vehicle didn't use the PN I was wanting to order. They said it didn't matter. So I gave them the VIN and explained the rest of the situation. They responded and said they upgraded it to a customer care order with my VIN and that instead of the 1 bearing that I ordered, they would try and get me 8 so I would have a set and that if they came in, they would inspect them carefully and re-package them if necessary to make sure they stayed in good shape this time. The guy I'm talking to at this dealer seems to know his stuff, so I'm hopeful. If it works out, I'll definitely let you guys know and we'll get some more bearings coming. I might even order and extra set, just incase.Izento wrote:You sure they wont get you KA bearings then if you provide the VIN for your american car? Thinking you are an idiot for ordering bearings for some random engine? Sounds like a bad mistake waiting to happen.float_6969 wrote:
Right now I'm waiting on another Nissan dealer. He said if I could get him a VIN, they could upgrade the order to a "customer care order"?
The Clevite's were fine. Their embeddability (one of the main advantages of a Aluminum) is what saved my crankshaft when the oil filter failed. I didn't own a mic when I ran them, just plastigauged the engine. IIRC, there was one main bearing that was tight (barely in spec spec), one too loose (out of spec), and all the rods were loose (way out of spec, over .002" IIRC). After mic'ing the engine, all of those results make sense now. If you were to use a single thickness bearing and put it in this motor, that is the exact results you would get. That says to me that the bearing thickness variance is low on the Clevites, which is a good thing normally. For my motor it doesn't work. Also, after seeing the stock bearings, none of the aftermarket bearings seem to have the same size chamfer on the edges for the fillet in the crank. The ACL races may be different. I've also discovered that the Duraglides are now made in China, not Australia, and numerous forums were seeing the same thing I saw, HUGE variance in bearing thickness. My variance was .0005" between the thickest and thinnest bearing halves in the Duraglides. NOT acceptable. Also, the Duraglides had NO CHAMFER whatsoever. I don't have a set of Clevites in front of me, but I don't THINK they had much, if any, of a chamfer either.mdb4879 wrote:So, with as popular and capable the Clevite 77's are, how do you feel they compare to the OEM Nissan bearings?
The first time I had the engine built, it was with Clevite's as well. The clearances wouldn't have been any different, I wouldn't think, and that engine lasted 40k miles before the oil filter failed. That being said, it was noisy and had low oil pressure.mdb4879 wrote:I jumped in without realizing how much had gone on since I last read this thread. Just a side note, when I put my motor together I think the clearances were right at the limit, if not a little over (0.002" iirc, but that may have been the rods. And I used plastigauge and didn't mic them) Regardless, I had great oil pressure. Dummy light went out the second it started, had 60psi at 2500-3000rpm and like 20psi at idle, both after the motor was at NOT. The motor ran great for 10,000 miles before the adapter fitting for my oil pressure sending unit snapped out of the block on the interstate. I would've liked to have had them tighter, but it was all I could work with without cutting the crank. By my machine shop's math they suggested a clearance right at the edge of what the FSM calls for, if not a little looser, but I still would've preferred to stay within spec. It seemed to work out fine for me, though.
Anyways, I can PM you the VIN from my Pulsar if it helps any. I scrapped my 1988 car the other day, but the crank is the same from the CA16, so my 1987 VIN should do you just fine.