OutToWinPAHC wrote:I would assume they would stress with the increased lift and duration. Call BC
I dont think its a binding issue, its the increased pressure caused by the extended lift over a longer duration. The springs fatigue and this is how valves float. The website even suggest using kit BC0210. So at what rate they bind or fatigue, no idea. But when a MFGR requires use of new springs, do it. Maybe check other springs as well.cukali wrote:Well, obviously they didnt answer my question. Obviously you cant either.redmachine wrote:Why don't you contact Brian Crower, but you have already done that, right? So what did they Crower say?
Thnx for wasting my time,
Merry Christmas.
It is a binding problem. I ended up measuring the max lift and the springs bind at around 0.39" of lift.OutToWinPAHC wrote:
I dont think its a binding issue, its the increased pressure caused by the extended lift over a longer duration. The springs fatigue and this is how valves float. The website even suggest using kit BC0210. So at what rate they bind or fatigue, no idea. But when a MFGR requires use of new springs, do it. Maybe check other springs as well.
cukali wrote:It is a binding problem. I ended up measuring the max lift and the springs bind at around 0.39" of lift.OutToWinPAHC wrote:
I dont think its a binding issue, its the increased pressure caused by the extended lift over a longer duration. The springs fatigue and this is how valves float. The website even suggest using kit BC0210. So at what rate they bind or fatigue, no idea. But when a MFGR requires use of new springs, do it. Maybe check other springs as well.