The new default MP mode is called Gold Rush, which plays similar to attack and defend modes in other games and the Dev claims that the standard conquest mode will be available at launch as free dlc due to popular demand. The only real gripe I have with the game is the FOV, it seems like you are always zoomed in a small bit, its similar to the issue bioshock had on the 360 almost as if the game isn't running in native 16:9 and they are zooming it in to compensate?MinisterofDOOM wrote:Singleplayer, really?
I might have to look into this, then. I liked BF:Vietnam a lot, but wished it had a real singleplayer campaign.
Does BC still play like a Battlefield game?
EDIT:Oooh, this game has the Hind gunship! Baddest rotary-wing aircraft ever.
BF2 was way better for larger scale, but they got hard to fill I guess and no one every plays them...2142 I though was kinda scaled down/boxed in a tiny bit, but not too bad.Hijacker wrote:I watched some of the vids that EA put out about the game on gametrailers.com I'm pretty stoked about it now.
I'm digging the destructible terrain deal. It's about time they introduced that into a game, because now sniping will be a true art. "There's a sniper? Blow up his nest!". Also, destroyed terrain tends to make some awesome battlefield changes that should hopefully make each round feel different from the last.
I kind of wish they'd go with the larger scale multiplayer from 2142. I've always liked how the squad/commander system was set up in that game. It was also really rewarding if you had a good squad that knew how to work well with each other. My friends and I squadded all the time together and would get some insane points totals at the end of maps because of how well we supported each other.
Are people on other console FPS's as bad at the game as the people playing this demo? This is the first FPS I have played on a console since the first socom, but I am top 3 all the time... I suck so bad with joysticks but I even take 1st often enough. I do much better then at computer FPS's that I play much more often.sr20fan wrote:ive spent more time on this demo than i would like to admit. i havent even picked up cod 4 since this was released.the destructibility is the coolest thing ive seen in awhile. enough grenades and mortar strikes, and the bases where you spawn dont even look the same.i like to think of this game, so far, as warhawk with cod4 graphics....ish. lol
Actually you are right they wouldn't hear you, each 12 man team is broken up into 3 squads and you can only communicate with your squad. In theory its a good idea because it cuts down on unecessary info but that assumes you're squad actually works together which in a pubbie game will never happen.TrueVillan wrote:I was playing online yesterday and man do these people suck. Half of my team didnt know what they were doing so we lost every round. I tried explaining it to them, but I didnt know if they heard me or not because no one talked back. Still a kick *** game though.
There are 3 bars at the top of the screen, the two small one represent the health of your two gold crates and the 3rd large one represents the remaining enemy reinforcements.s13jus10 wrote:..just one question though... how the HELL do you win when you're defending? I've won on defense before, I just don't know how. do you just need to hold off attackers for a certain amount of time? or kill a certain number of people? I don't get it.
I am with you....other then the fact that BF2 >> BF2142Hijacker wrote:So I'm playing the online demo this weekend with some friends over. I'm good in 2142, but only because I've been playing that for forever and a day, and my clan mates and I back each other up really well.
Btw, I suck at console FPSes and I was still pulling top 5 duties. The only time I fell below that was when I would be driving a tank and a teammate would decide he needed to be flattened.
All in all, the demo makes me want to buy the game. The gold rush mode is kick ***.
I just wish this was being released for the FPS birthplace. PC.
Its cheap as hell now man, and still really active...Pick it up Its on the same engine, so graphics are just about as good...Maps range from 2142 sizes to bigger, and guns work a bit better. 2142 guns kinda blow TBH, other then the adjustable sniper scope which kicks a lot of *** (so much better then most games, since one click goes between scope and not scoped...rather then having to go through all the zoom levels to see what is going on around you like some games.Hijacker wrote:I never played BF2, so 2142 has been my only battlefield game. I really love the size of 2142. 32v32 maps are just freaking rape fests in Gibralter and Cerbere