Post by
C-Kwik »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/c-kwik-u426.html
Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:02 am
The SAFC and the Standard E-Manage use teh same method of fuel control. The user interface is obviously different as the SAFC uses a handheld display and the E-Manage uses a laptop or an option display with controller(more $$$). I prefer the laptop myself, though it's not s convenient, but once tuned, you really souldn't have to touch it again anyways. The E-manage has a better map resolution and ease of use.
The major difference between the standard E-Manage and the Ultimate is that teh standard used the MAF to control fuel and perhaps can add fuel by supplying it's own injector ground. It can only shorten a pulse by altering the MAF signal. The Ultimate will bypass the OE ECU injector drivers completely. It supplies it's own and shorthens the injector duration by actually shortineing the injector pulse itself. This allows what I mentioned above about the part throttle high boost conditions. It also allows you to use teh full potential of the fuel system. Since teh standard E-Manage and the SAFC intercept and alter the MAF signal, when the actual MAF maxes out, the injectors will not. When I had an e-manage, the MAF would read 5 volts, but the 370cc injectors would only go up to about 84% duration (IIRC) and the altered MAF signal would go no higher than 4.xx volts. You could not hit 100 if you wanted to. This gets worse if you go with even larger injectors. You could add fuel using the standard E-Manage's injector drivers, but the tuning is no longer linear as you have to use another map. Since the Ultimate controls the injectors entirely by itself, the fuel mapping could be done on one map. From a tuning standpoint, this would be the easiest and most logical approach.