Yep, that's the one. Strut tower separated on their car about a month before they announced the recall. Thankfully it did not knock the steering out like it has been reported to do in some cases. I would prefer my parents take a payout or even a fair trade in value over a repair, just due to future safety questions, etc. Thanks for the number, I will pass that to them and see if they tried it. They did call some Nissan 1-800 in the past and wasn't able to get very far up the chain before getting the "nothing we can do, sir."Towncivilian wrote:Is this related to the Pathfinder / QX4 rust recall?
You can give 1-800-NISSAN1 a call - it's the consumer affairs number.
This^. What year Pathy or QX4 is it?Jesda wrote:Gather evidence of the vehicle's value and contact an attorney.
Funny story, my dad actually is a lawyer, not in this area of law though. They haven't taken him very seriously though, sticking to their guns even when he points out problems. He might end up consulting a consumer law expert. Though even at best case there is not a lot of money on the line here, so it seems like going a legal route would be a lose-lose for everyone except the lawyer.Bubba1 wrote:This^. What year Pathy or QX4 is it?Jesda wrote:Gather evidence of the vehicle's value and contact an attorney.
That does suck, but I think you're pretty much on target that given it's 15 yrs old, the difference between the low ball purchase figure and what the dealership would give them for it in trade is probably not all that much. So fighting it via the legal system will likely cost more than its worth.bcar240 wrote: Funny story, my dad actually is a lawyer, not in this area of law though. They haven't taken him very seriously though, sticking to their guns even when he points out problems. He might end up consulting a consumer law expert. Though even at best case there is not a lot of money on the line here, so it seems like going a legal route would be a lose-lose for everyone except the lawyer.
My parents are having to replace this otherwise perfectly good vehicle, so they are going to be out a lot. The car is a '97 Pathy, so it is barely worth anything in Nissan's eyes (or reality). They are realistic and are not expecting to get paid more than it is worth, just a fair amount for the vehicle and hopefully a little compensation for the trouble due to the unreasonably slow time frame (had to borrow a car from family for this entire period) and expensive repairs they had to have done before the recall was announced that were caused by the defect (the mechanic from one of these was test driving the car when the strut tower failed.)
Did they explain how they came up with the number they did? Did they provide documentation of such?bcar240 wrote:Yeah, It just stinks that just about a month before the announcement of the recall they had paid 40% of what they are now being offered for diagnostics and repairs on the electronics (ECM, etc.) because the failing strut tower had started cutting into a wiring loom. They were going to pick the car from this repair the day the tower separated on the mechanic and obviously have not been able to drive it since. My advice right now to my dad is that if Nissan will give some money for the repair and let him keep the car then do it, otherwise it's not worth sinking any more of his money in. But Nissan says giving us money to fix the repair independently is not an option, they either fix it themselves or total it with a payout (not surprising, seems like fairly standard practice).
The deadline is looming for them to accept or Nissan "will assume they reject the offer." My dad said he tried that number but got a loop of people passing the buck and no one with authority to make a decision. I suggested he try it again and see if he could get any further. I also remember reading about people sending letters/emails to the Nissan USA head management people and getting help, but I can't find any direct addresses.
If they (Nissan) have had the vehicle for 10 months I would make sure they reimburse at the cars worth then and not now.bcar240 wrote:The car is a '97 Pathy, so it is barely worth anything in Nissan's eyes (or reality).