gbear wrote:I subscribe to all the auto mags, and every test I've read of the Nismo Z has it slower than the regular Z in the 0-60, and quarter by a significant amount. None of the mags had the Nismo under 5.0 for 0-60, but all had the regular Z in the 4.7-4.8 second range. One of the mags said that the Z engines need an extended break in period to make full power , and the regular Z's they tested had about 5000 miles on them and the Nismo's had less than 1000. They all raved about the Nismo as a road racer. Could be Nissan did not want to build a drag racer, but a road course car-Where the Nismo excels.
Different car magazine test differently. Not only can procedures be different, but test conditions and type of equipment used can make a difference as well. Not to mention the state of the motor as you mentioned.
That said, Road and Track notes the Nismo 370Z posted both 0-60 and 1/4 miles times that were 0.2 seconds quicker than the base version (based on their own tests). Further, the trap speed noted is 106.6 mph vs the base motor's 103.9 mph. Trap speed is one of the bigger indications of HP and generally is affected very little by traction and gearing.
Lastly, we are only taking about a peak power difference of 18 HP. Based on the relatively small increase in peak torque, it would appear the biggest gains were closer to redline as there is about a 12 lb-ft gain at 7400 RPM. The 6 lb-ft gain at 5400 RPM translates to only about a 6 HP gain there. Even with 18 HP though, acceleration isn't going to be all that significant. 18 HP only represents a 5% increase and its not occuring at all RPMs.
Its been a while since I read Automobile magazine regularly, but I have the impression their numbers were always on the slower end. While Motor Trend seems to be faster.