Armada SE or Pathfinder LE??

A forum for the legendary Nissan Pathfinder and Infiniti QX4.
kenlin28
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:51 pm
Car: 08 Altima 4 DR

Post

Deciding between a 2010 Armada SE (no options) or a 2010 Pathfinder LE w. NAV. Not needing to tow anything. Getting tired of my Altima and looking for a SUV again after I replaced the Sequioa. Any thoughts??


User avatar
sicwitit
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: part fabricator
Location: Tokyo Japan

Post

Armada uses more fuel, but can carry 7 passengers and look better on 24"s then the pathy

Pathfinder, fully loaded costs the same, uses less fuel can carry same amount of passengers, they just have to be young thin models, and is probably cheaper on insurance. Its also easier to park.

In the end, you will save money with the Pathy, but look more baller in the Armada. What are your wants and needs for an SUV? if your not towing, or hauling tons of people/stuff the Pathy is the winner.

User avatar
JonathanPrem
Posts: 673
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:56 pm
Car: 02 Nissan pathfinder 4WD SE

Post

Armada Hands down. Looks 100x better but downside is it eats more gas.

User avatar
sixty4
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:53 am
Car: 2008 QX56
1964 Lincoln Continental

Gone:
2006 QX56, 1998 QX4, 2001 QX4, 2000 I30

Post

My brother has an armada, I have an QX4. I have to admit that things a bus. I do want the QX56 but I ride the Metro to work everyday. Like everyone said you have to decide what's best for you when you look at gas, space, parking, driving.

My brother went to get a pathfinder but decided at the dealer that for the extra 5K or so he might as well get the Armada. He's happy, I was too when we put 4 adults, 2 car seats w/ kids and still had room for two strollers.


kenlin28
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:51 pm
Car: 08 Altima 4 DR

Post

I have a 10 mile drive to work so gas consumption won't be that much of a deal. Both are similarly priced...Armada SE is around 34-35k whereas the Path is around 37k. I know if I get a Path, I will regret it because of the extra space that I don't really need now (kids are age 4 and 6), but I like the bigger size coming from a 04 Sequoia. But if I decide on the Armada, I know when or if gas goes up to $3.00+, I will regret filiing up the gas tank! Decisions, decisions!!!

Ubel Feuer
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:40 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Pathy or die.

MagicM
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:28 pm
Car: 2007 Black/alu trim /black interior M35x 2005 Range Rover HSE 2000 Range Rover p38 4.0SE

Post

I love the Pathys (had a 01 Le since new), but honestlty if you want a big tank get a Land Cruiser, it's superior to both them in every way. I bought a new LE 06 and frankly i was utterly disappointed with it and it got sold shortly after, and the Armada is the same story. Maybe if you want something smaller than the Armada, but more luxurious than the Pathfinder a Range Rover sport might be good. Buuuuut... if you must have a armada or pathfinder, since you are not going to tow anything i would go with the Pathfinder LE, smaller and easier to drive, and with the V8 will haul more a** than the heavy armada.

QX4ME
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 5:58 am
Car: 02 Infiniti QX4 4WD
11 MB C300 Sports
06 Honda Odyssey
Location: CA

Post

What about reliability? Armada is rated very low...Reliability is always my #1 consideration. It seems many people either don't care or forget to check that out.


Return to “Nissan Pathfinder Forum / Infiniti QX4 Forum”