That is from the CURRENT 110th Congress. Not his entire voting record.rn79870 wrote:Let's take the Washington Posts figures. Your "Republican" paper.
John McCain missed more than any other Senator, 63.8% of the vote.
Unlike other claims, I'll offer a cite for my numbers.
http://projects.washingtonpost...ssers/
Spoke too soon didn't you wingfeather.
OWNED X2!!!szhosain wrote:That is from the CURRENT 110th Congress. Not his entire voting record.
Obama:Total missed - 293Cast - 982Percent missed - 23%szhosain wrote:
Interesting! What are Obama's numbers?
Z
Just as a comparison... here's John Kerry's voting record for election year 2004...rn79870 wrote:Let's take the Washington Posts figures. Your "Republican" paper.
John McCain missed more than any other Senator, 63.8% of the vote.
Unlike other claims, I'll offer a cite for my numbers.
http://projects.washingtonpost...ssers/
Spoke too soon didn't you wingfeather.
What are you going to do when your random fact generator breaks? Where are you going to find your information?wingFeather wrote:Democrats need to actually do something SOON to earn their mythical reputation as saviors of women and "minorities". They've been doing too much AGAINST women & minorities.
Glad to read that someone else sees this fallacy
As stated here, which comes from many sources.rn79870 wrote:What are you going to do when your random fact generator breaks? Where are you going to find your information?
smockers83 wrote:The Republicans were the ones who freed the slaves back in 1865.
Affirmative action has been gotten rid of in Democratic states (something I actually support).
Democrats have always claimed to be the party for minorities, the middle class, and what not, but I've never believed it. For example, the middle class. Tax policies are that they reduce taxes on them, however they increase taxes on businesses which forces businesses to cut back on jobs that middle class people fill, which is something Obama wants to do. There are paradoxes in his tax plan and the so called Democratic ideals.
Excuse me? I didn't call anyone names, thank you. People have been attacked much worse before and their posts don't get deleted. Why mine? Because I said you used statistics incorrectly and called you out on it?rn79870 wrote:Smockers83. Posts that attack a person, any person will be deleted. Your post was deleted for that reason. Learn to express yourself without resorting to calling names.
The comment you quoted wasn't directed at you Smocky, but to someone who thinks opinions are facts.smockers83 wrote:
As stated here, which comes from many sources.
Agreed. Any post that personally and specifically attacks another member of NICO is not acceptable. I have been a teensy bit guilty of this too and am learning to do way better.rn79870 wrote:Don't take offense, but all posts, as soon as I see them, or another mod sees them, that refer to another poster in an unflattering manner will be deleted, not edited anymore.
I don't know Dems that do that, but I do know that there is a strong correlation between white racists and a preference for the Republican party.96Qowner wrote:For a very long time Democrats have been touting themselves as the Party of minorities and women. They say Republicans are racists, because they don't tend to offer preference to Blacks and oppose Affirmative Action.
ishkabibble wrote:Palin was chosen simply because she is a woman, so using your logic, the Repubs are both racist and sexist.
You mean like this fine Republican leader in Pennsylvania?ishkabibble wrote:
I don't know Dems that do that, but I do know that there is a strong correlation between white racists and a preference for the Republican party.
.