Apexi SAFC2 [VS] EMANAGE [VS] HKS AFR [VS] Anything else

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
nikn
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:57 am
Car: stuff

Post

i was wondering which of these would be better for fuel controlling.

...at...http://www.mvpmotorsports.com/...hYN=N

the SAFC2 is 349$the HKS is 231$the Emanage is 309$ + 37$ for injector harnessare these common prices or overpriced?

not sure bout this...the SAFC2 can change injevtor duty cycle by up to 50%the Greddy emanage by 20% the HKS by ???

The APEXI SAFC2 seems to have similar features to HKS AFC, and the emanage can always be upgraded...

any competitors to these? AEM EMS... ..etc?

which of these 3 is better?

to me it seems like the HKS is best for low-medium boost [up to 10 psi]


User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

safc 2's are 270 on ebay

curt

SloMoe
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:11 pm
Car: Fast Cars, Music, Girls

Post

AEM EMS is a very good system, but there is no plug and play kit offered for the KA. Some other alternatives to AEM are stand-alones like Motec, Electromotive Tec3, and Haltech to just to name a few. These systems including the AEM are rather expensive, compared to piggyback systems like the Emanage and SAFC. If you only planning on boosting up to 10psi a stand-alone EMS is a little overkill.

DriFt3r
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 2:05 pm
Car: Racing and Drifting

Post

How about up to 15 psi? would these still be useful? And 20 PSI?

nikn
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:57 am
Car: stuff

Post

so what u guys know about the HKS AFR????? Can u run a Z32 maf with it?

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

I found the HKS AFR for 205 shipped. Other than some minor differences, the HKS AFR and Apexi SAFC are similar, the reason the Apexi unit costs 100 bucks more is its fancy display.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

DriFt3r wrote:How about up to 15 psi? would these still be useful? And 20 PSI?


Short answer, NO.

They can only modify your A/F ratio -50%/+50% over stock. SO with either of em, you can run ~550cc injectors max. 20psi...that would prolly need 740cc or so.

nikn
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:57 am
Car: stuff

Post

u could try putting an extra resistor on the signal to the injectors. It would take some more time to tune... cuz u dont know the duty cycle...

fastpace
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 6:29 am
Car: cars of course

Post

I don't know if you have seen this site, but hope it helps:

http://www.hksusa.com/products/more.asp?id=811

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

aleph1 wrote:Short answer, NO.

They can only modify your A/F ratio -50%/+50% over stock. SO with either of em, you can run ~550cc injectors max. 20psi...that would prolly need 740cc or so.


So far fromo what I've read, the limitation is not from the E-Manage itself. I am not as sure about the AFC. But you can set the parameters beyond the 50% limitation. But the limitations seem to be both the ability of the ECU to control the large injectors at low duty cycles. And secondly, issues of ignition timing. When you give the ECU a lower MAF signal to fool it, the ECU will think there is less actual air and will bump up the timing. Too low a signal can cause too much timing advance. The E-Manage can tunes some out, but I don't know how much the ECU would advance it. Too much of a correction factor may put it out of the range of the E-Manage's ability to tune the timing back out.

User avatar
cyrus240sx
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 5:44 pm
Car: 95 240sx with five lug swap, rims, suspension, I H E, remote start, too bad its auto

Post

god damn... thats cheap for the hks afr..... im getting that instead of a safc2

User avatar
SSS
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:45 pm

Post

SMT6 by Perfect Power.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

C-Kwik wrote:So far fromo what I've read, the limitation is not from the E-Manage itself. I am not as sure about the AFC. But you can set the parameters beyond the 50% limitation. But the limitations seem to be both the ability of the ECU to control the large injectors at low duty cycles. And secondly, issues of ignition timing. When you give the ECU a lower MAF signal to fool it, the ECU will think there is less actual air and will bump up the timing. Too low a signal can cause too much timing advance. The E-Manage can tunes some out, but I don't know how much the ECU would advance it. Too much of a correction factor may put it out of the range of the E-Manage's ability to tune the timing back out.


I should have specified that I wasn't talking about the Emanage, I don't know too much about it. But as far as the AFR and SAFC are concerned, in their features it lists that they can only modify it so much, could be because of the ECU or just the piggyback units themselves...or both.

As for my plan, HKS AFR and MSD BTM all the way. I like modular style, It makes me uncomfortable having something like an Emanage, not able to correct it easily on the fly and such...just MHO.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

The E-Manage says the same thing. As long as the SAFC and AFR allow a greater adjustment thorugh the controls than 50%, then there will be some motors that can handle it. I've heard of SR's running 720's and KA's running 550's on an E-Manage. Since all three do the same thing to compensate for fuel, it would be subject to the same actual limitations. I am just not sure if the SAFC and AFR are scaled to adjust more than 50%.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

The SAFC won't let you setup more than +-50%, at least the II won't and I'm pretty sure the I also.

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

There's also a DIY standalone called the Megasquirt. I might look into this something in the future and start mucking around with it. Can be build for under $200 with proper skills and knowledge :)

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

huguetpj wrote:The SAFC won't let you setup more than +-50%, at least the II won't and I'm pretty sure the I also.


That was what I wasn't sure of. But that sucks nonetheless considering that Nissan ECU's seem to work so well with the E-Manage. Chalk another positive point to the E-Manage.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

C-Kwik wrote:Chalk another positive point to the E-Manage.


Definetely

nikn
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:57 am
Car: stuff

Post

since Emanage can only adjust up to 20% injector duty cycle, how would one go about running say 550 injectors with an emanage?????

DSMs_Suck
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 7:55 am
Car: Money, *****es, and 40s

Post

You will definately want more than +-20% thats not even enough to run 370s. With that said you would have to go with the SAFC or Emanage. Especially if you are just trying to keep a more mild setup with only 10 psi 370s will be enough for you and all of these piggyback systems will work just fine... The increase in timing would be minimal and if you want to correct for it just knock the base timing back a few degrees.

Also just as another option, voice your opinion :)http://www.nissaninfiniticlub....55794

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Hacked MAF plus a piggy back...whatever brand you go with. I know a few guys who run a similer setup, not the same way you guys hack the MAF but with the same end result. Combined with the HKS AFR they were able to run 660's on there RB20's. Really good idle and it passed emissions. I was toying with that idea myself. Except with smaller 50lb primaries.

WD

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

nikn wrote:since Emanage can only adjust up to 20% injector duty cycle, how would one go about running say 550 injectors with an emanage?????


I think you misunderstood what the emanage can do... it can physically extend the injector duty cycle by a certain percentage, but to add bigger injectors, you punch in your old values + new values and it automatically scales the MAF output voltage accordingly, kapisch?

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

To add to that, the E-Manage is limited to +/- 20 Percent only when you use the adjusments on the E-Manage(rotary dials) With the support tool, you open up a lot more functionality.

nikn
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:57 am
Car: stuff

Post

i get it now. thanks guys

that GM MAF setup seems interesting...

spitz7985
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 11:01 am
Car: HICAS S13

Post

can you run a z32 MAF with an AFR/SAFC/e-manage??

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

I dunno about the emanage, but the AFR and AFC, yes.

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

spitz7985 wrote:can you run a z32 MAF with an AFR/SAFC/e-manage??


Yes you can run z32 MAF on the emanage, or the SR20det, or any other MAFs that are in the emanage.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”