hmm, i'm averaging 25 mpg on my 1989 sohc engine <mainly higway driving on 130/ 295> w/out using any of this stuff... i just keep my oil changes/maintenance items in check & have 87 octane. 230,000 miles on it & will probably seafoam the car next spring to keep it that way :Phek1620 wrote:so, i got 217 miles on 10 gallons. 21.7mpg. is this good. i'm thinking this is a little low for a four banger but i don't know. what do yall think?
I get 21-22 mpg city, and 28 mpg highway on a DOHC, so 25 mixed sounds about right, and the other gentleman's 21.7 is good if that's all city.ricebike wrote:hmm, i'm averaging 25 mpg on my 1989 sohc engine <mainly higway driving on 130/ 295> w/out using any of this stuff... i just keep my oil changes/maintenance items in check & have 87 octane. 230,000 miles on it & will probably seafoam the car next spring to keep it that way :P
it's a good read, but i gotta go some mo' research to justify putting this or mothballs in the gas tank. <edit: mothballs don't do shizzle; i just recalled an episode of mythbusters>
Modified by ricebike at 1:12 PM 10/1/2005
1. Don't associate chemicals by name. Just because toluene is a base in TNT does not make it unstable. It's the nitrogen oxide groupings that give the substance it's thermodynamic nature. It's full name is 2,4,6-trinitromethylbenzene, and it isn't very volitile at all. You need to use a primer to detonate to support the organic decomposition of the subtance. You are thinking of nitroglycerin which is the red headed step child of the whole TNT discovery.unfortunatepenguin wrote:Hey guys one the subject of fuel additives, has anyone tried Toluene, back in the old days they used to use it alot for high compression engines as it has a high natural octane (i think it was in the 100-110 range) I remember see a site a while back that explained the process of mixing it but it was similar to the processed explained here with acetone, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toluene , theres it's chemical properties and some other info. I'll see if I can't find that site out there.
EDIT: I found some more info on this subject Toluene has a Octane of 127, Toluene appears naturally in gas as a byproduct of refining, and from what I gather it replaces missing hydrocarbons or something like that which safely leans out the A/F. Also Xylene (same family as Toluene) has an octane of 165. Ooo and both of these chemicals ARE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, so make sure you read up on safe handling of this stuff, and last thing TNT (dynamite) stands for TriNitro"Toluene"....
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was refering more towards the dangers of fumes/ingestion then towards combustion, if I recall correctly because of the makeup of Toluene your body cannot naturally dispose of it via water (piss it out) and the fumes are supposedly quite toxic. But not only the fumes, the exhaust is quite potent with hydrocarbons and the such after combustion (way more then usual, so you Cali guys are outta luck) so please do use caution when using it *disclaimer fine print*Nismo_Freak wrote: 1. Don't associate chemicals by name. Just because toluene is a base in TNT does not make it unstable. It's the nitrogen oxide groupings that give the substance it's thermodynamic nature. It's full name is 2,4,6-trinitromethylbenzene, and it isn't very volitile at all. You need to use a primer to detonate to support the organic decomposition of the subtance. You are thinking of nitroglycerin which is the red headed step child of the whole TNT discovery.
Ricebike, I work at a gas station, and one of the things you do at a gas station (obviously) is to monitor the gas readings, which come by in big long print outs of all the different stats (volume, temp, etc.) one of the things we have to monitor is the inches of water that reside in the gas tanks (the big underground ones, we have four 8,000 gallon tanks) I did the math one time during the winter (when we're incredibly slow on 3rd shift) and lets all hope that the water/gas ratio can sustain more water then that as I remember having something like a 17% water content (not including errors for sludge, etc. that build up at the bottom of the tanks.ricebike wrote:soo those gasline antifreeze alcohol based products don't work to absorb the water in the fuel tank? esp when people don't keep @ least 1/2 tank of fuel so that condensation won't form & have water in the gas?
i also recall up to 10% water content in the gas is acceptable; heck water is a decent carbon cleaner