Yes - agreed!! We (my company) do a lot of cellular work and we do drive-testing of our customers equipment for vehicle tracking and radio certifications for our technology. The inside antennas don't make a difference.Q45tech wrote:An inside antenna may be no better than holding a portable to ones ear. The major problem is the line of sight to cell tower......blocked by metal.
Tougher problem nowadays!Q45tech wrote:Once had 6 antenna on my company car never got a ticket.
I forgot to mention: these antennas need to be more than 8 to 10 inches apart (these are the 3dB gain magnetic mounts available from Radio Shack). Else they start affecting each others performance!szhosain wrote:with 6 to 10 cellular magnetic mount antennas on his car ...
Hmmm ... want another job in the cellular industry? We are always looking for good people!Q45tech wrote:In a former life did a lot a testing for AMPS [Motorolas first hand held in early 80's].
We use magnetic mounts because it is the employee's personal car! Don't wanna drill permanent holes in it and it does not always need the multiple antennas when we are not actually doing testing (when he drives to/fro home)!Q45tech wrote:Magnetic mounts [?] I love to drill round holes in top and rear fenders and trunk.
We use similar hidden antennas for our car theft recovery systems ... at cellular frequencies (850Mhz). These do have some losses, but are still very usable with our transmission technology, which works down to about -105dbM RSSI.Q45tech wrote:Lots of Secret service and DEA have hidden under rear deck tuned cavity antenna but they are at 410-420 Mhz.
ROFL!! Pretty funny!Q45tech wrote:How about something decorative and eye catching:http://www.northcountryradio.c...4.gifhttp://www.northcountryradio.c...e.htm
For a frequency of 850 Mhz and above the diameter of the top disc would be 0.17lamda or ~~1.5"..............you could cover it with a tiny plastic Xmas tree.
For older AMPS phones, that is the maximum (although the base stations will send out power level commands to reduce handset transmission power - based on distance from the tower). CDMA and GSM are different power - also have more tightly controlled power levels and steps than AMPS.BigBodyQ45 wrote:Damn, 60 watt phone? What are the current ones, .6 right?
my current ATT phone is tri band gsm. [850, 1800, 1900 MHz]szhosain wrote:
850-only GSM handsets are not available that I know of ... most US GSM handsets are 1900 or dual-band 850/1900 (will become more common as Cingular and AT&T complete their 850 MHz transition from TDMA in the future.) I would also think that most available GSM phones will become tri-band soon enough (850, 1900 and 1800 for Europe).
Cool! It is happening sooner than I thought ... apparently, most of the carriers who have roaming deals in Europe have introduced loads of tri-band phones. Some are even quad-band, from what I see at the web sites.IvoryJ30t wrote:my current ATT phone is tri band gsm. [850, 1800, 1900 MHz]
This one is similar to the Radio Shack ones.BigBodyQ45 wrote:Is there anything I can get off of ebay that I can search for?
It is always better to use hard wire connections - they have less power reflectance, and less loss, at the interface "through" the glass. They are better than nothing, but it would be better to use the wired ones.BigBodyQ45 wrote:Are those repeater antennas BS?
how about those?