Post by
DrNick »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/drnick-u118348.html
Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:10 pm
Just so you don't confuse what i'm trying to say. I'm not arguing that on these motors an intake is not one of the first places to start. As an engine is basically an air pump, moving more air good.
I agree that allowing the engine to be more efficient by tackling the intake and exhaust systems should be the primary objective for most people here. However, adding more air will also lean the mix if not compensated for. It's just the way it works. Intake mfgrs may not intentionally design the part to lean out the mix as it's primary function, but it will happen. I've yet to see any aftermarket performance intake system that does not make the engine run leaner. If a mod leans out the fuel mix and another does the same I don't think it's fair to say one is inherently safe and one inherently dangerous unless one leans out significantly and one not so much.
The only reason I felt the need to chime in is that there are few modern cars that cannot benefit from better computer control of engine parameters. I know i'm coming from a different application and might not have the benefit of experience in this specific application, however, there are some concepts that are universal and I just don't understand how everyone views engine management as worthless or dangerous here. It may not be the cheapest, or best place to start, but do most members here not realize that you can get more from each mod by adjusting the tune to take full advantage? There is much much much greater of a chance to blow a motor by adding more air and leaning the fuel mix w/o any direct control or compensation vs. adjusting the fuel and timing maps directly in the engine computer. There's always a learning curve, but Cobb has a good overall reputation elsewhere and they didn't get where they are today by consistently blowing motors.