Fight the machines! ! ! !hbpignosePA wrote:
i dont want a car that has its cams run off a computer; or any of that other electrical garbage that automakers have put on cars lately
You give that idea up. It's been done. Numerous times. Nissan really doesn't give a f*** what we think.Cap’n Morgatz wrote:Hell, I wouldn't mind getting a petition or something together; see if we can't yell at them enough to make 'em think twice about cancelling the return of the greatest car... well, a great car. >_>
i don't understand this i've checked my gas mileage and my sr does close to 30 highway and about 20 city but the brand new ford fusion can barely do 24 city and 35 highway (just typed in gas mileage new cars first thing that came up) my sohc was the same way also 20-25 mpgpepegurr wrote:I have to agree on the milage my sohc got around 21-23mpg while my Rb20 gets 30-31 so i would imagine that the sr(if mostly stock) would be around the same area.
Hyundai did it first and Nissan is just not going to compete because of the economy right now. If I have the money I would get 370z instead, or at least a used 350z. FM platform of 350z has a proven chassis, why would Nissan spend more money to develope a new one, and risk losing a whole lot more money down the pipeline.hpmachine wrote:Hyundai beat them to the punch. Plus a used 350z would be far better than that pseudo 240 they were gonna make. Fail.
Geo Metro Nuff saidcody180sx wrote:
i don't understand this i've checked my gas mileage and my sr does close to 30 highway and about 20 city but the brand new ford fusion can barely do 24 city and 35 highway (just typed in gas mileage new cars first thing that came up) my sohc was the same way also 20-25 mpg
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/01/09 ... E=simmode1]
are you really going to tell me in 20 years technology hasn't advanced in gas burning tech i know a guy that has a crx that gets close to 40 mpg highway and that was in the late 80's to early 90's no it's not fast but i'm talking cars in general for commuting and don't give me this bull s*** about hybrids they only do 48 mpg only 8 more miles in 20 years something is up here
Saw blue one on the street for the first time. It was ugly as hell.Mangid wrote:
Is this a Redesign of the Tiburon?DirtyGhettoKids wrote:[img]
This car wins on so many levels, I hate Hyundai too. I don't care what anyone says, the genesis coupe is a nice car.
This is off the original topic, but the reason we don't have more efficient cars is because people wanted more and more features- hence more weight. Plus the SUV craze probably helped people with the notion that a big, heavy vehicle is safer. More weight even with more efficient engines doesn't make a more efficient vehicle.Case in point- evolution of Honda's cars. Fit is the new Civic, Civic is the new Accord, Accord is some sort of luxury car. My first car was an 81 Accord- about the same size wheelbase as the new Fit.Back on topic. New S chassis would have to be a return to lightness, which I seem to recall was a goal of Nissan- having vehicles 15% lighter or something like that (Rumors and Lies section of SCC, within a few months of SCC demise ). If anything, I think Nissan should develop a smaller Silvia- slightly larger than a Miata, 2L NA 180hp, offer a coupe and convertible. I'll buy one (that is, if I ever stop hemorraging money on my s13).cody180sx wrote:
i don't understand this i've checked my gas mileage and my sr does close to 30 highway and about 20 city but the brand new ford fusion can barely do 24 city and 35 highway (just typed in gas mileage new cars first thing that came up) my sohc was the same way also 20-25 mpg
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/01/09 ... E=simmode1]
are you really going to tell me in 20 years technology hasn't advanced in gas burning tech i know a guy that has a crx that gets close to 40 mpg highway and that was in the late 80's to early 90's no it's not fast but i'm talking cars in general for commuting and don't give me this bull s*** about hybrids they only do 48 mpg only 8 more miles in 20 years something is up here
I agree with u totally, the miata has become pretty big now, so they should make it miata sized, just a tad bigger for some rear seats. And if anything, they should tweak the QR25DE, the same 2.5L 4 banger they use in other current nissans. Or even make it QR25DE-TAjax wrote:slightly larger than a Miata, 2L NA 180hp, offer a coupe and convertible.
If Nissan could do that and make it look like this, then that would be a game changer. But we all know this ain't happenin any time soon...Ignacius_Rebenga wrote:I agree with u totally, the miata has become pretty big now, so they should make it miata sized, just a tad bigger for some rear seats. And if anything, they should tweak the QR25DE, the same 2.5L 4 banger they use in other current nissans. Or even make it QR25DE-T
I just can't picture that car sliding.......DirtyGhettoKids wrote:
This car wins on so many levels, I hate Hyundai too. I don't care what anyone says, the genesis coupe is a nice car.
It was a sports car. We just didnt get the sports car engine..leesredgt wrote:
Thats the thing.Thats what the 240sx was at its time.
It wasnt a sports car.Def. wasnt the fastest.Def.wasnt the best looking either.
It was an econo car.