Check out the 0-100 and 1/4 mile, MT has a significant advantageSHIFT_2.5S wrote:Again, mcheddadi lists the 0-60 times of both, with the manual's impressive 0.1 second difference over the CVT.
Regardless, a manual transmission will feel faster 90% of the time because it's just that...a manual. BMW's SMG transmission is rather fast though, when compared to other auto transmissions.
notaverage wrote:
Check out the 0-100 and 1/4 mile, MT has a significant advantage
not from what i've been seeing. usually MT's are better w/mileage, but the CVT is very very close to the manual. i believe it's generally 1 mpg lower. that's just from the sticker estimate, FWIW.generic808 wrote:I believe the CVT actually gets better gas mileage than the manuals. I could be wrong, but that's what I remember seeing.
But in all seriousness, how many people are going to be using their FWD A/C to drag race. And if so, how often will that be a factor?mcheddadi wrote:Look at the 0 to 100mph, lol that's where it's at! no one ever drag races to stop at 60mph, most of the time they stop at around 100mph.
lol
cliffy21 wrote:
You buy the transmission that makes sense to you. The argument about which is "better" is stupid. Who cares if the manual is a tenth or so faster if the car is a daily driver to work? The CVT is impressive for an automatic setup, we should just be happy it's an option. We could be stuck with a crap 4 speed automatic like other cars still use.....
I award you the logical, no-nonsense post of the week!cliffy21 wrote:
You buy the transmission that makes sense to you. The argument about which is "better" is stupid. Who cares if the manual is a tenth or so faster if the car is a daily driver to work? The CVT is impressive for an automatic setup, we should just be happy it's an option. We could be stuck with a crap 4 speed automatic like other cars still use.....