These cars with smaller engines are more a result of requests from the Marketing department to generate sales than they are for providing customers a more fuel efficient car. Fact is your mileage is far more dependent on the manner in which you drive than on the size of the engine - meaning simply that you can realize surprisingly good gas mileage driving cars with big engines if you follow the same techniques as the "hyper-milers". Don't believe me? Just look at the EPA mileage of the "M" hybrid. If you really believe you can get that EPA mileage while enjoying the full 360 HP available, you are fooling yourself, your mileage driving that car can be and will be terrible if you drive with a lead foot. But believe me, you can get the EPA mileage from that big heavy car with that big gas engine if you drive sensibly - and likely even more! It is all about how you drive, not about how big the engine is. That is one reason the hybrids get such great gas mileage - because they normally run on the very efficient Atkinson cycle gas engines with flat torque curves and get their high torque when needed for acceleration from the torquey electric motor. It is not all about regenerative braking efficiency. The G25 is a fine car, just don't buy it simply to get better gas mileage. In fact you likely might realize worse mileage because you will always be "flooring it" in futile attempts for more acceleration.williammoses wrote:A couple of months ago I read a review of the G25, but I can't remember where. My recollection is that compared to the G37, the reviewer found the vehicle
disappointing--notably underpowered and mileage only marginally improved.
Yes, agreed! On my 6.0L LS2 V8 engine (GTO) with stock 400horsepower, in town, stop and go driving, my gas mileage isn't much worse than my EX35.. about same 14 to 15mpg in town. LOL!DDS wrote:These cars with smaller engines are more a result of requests from the Marketing department to generate sales than they are for providing customers a more fuel efficient car. Fact is your mileage is far more dependent on the manner in which you drive than on the size of the engine - meaning simply that you can realize surprisingly good gas mileage driving cars with big engines if you follow the same techniques as the "hyper-milers". Don't believe me? Just look at the EPA mileage of the "M" hybrid. If you really believe you can get that EPA mileage while enjoying the full 360 HP available, you are fooling yourself, your mileage driving that car can be and will be terrible if you drive with a lead foot. But believe me, you can get the EPA mileage from that big heavy car with that big gas engine if you drive sensibly - and likely even more! It is all about how you drive, not about how big the engine is. That is one reason the hybrids get such great gas mileage - because they normally run on the very efficient Atkinson cycle gas engines with flat torque curves and get their high torque when needed for acceleration from the torquey electric motor. It is not all about regenerative braking efficiency. The G25 is a fine car, just don't buy it simply to get better gas mileage. In fact you likely might realize worse mileage because you will always be "flooring it" in futile attempts for more acceleration.williammoses wrote:A couple of months ago I read a review of the G25, but I can't remember where. My recollection is that compared to the G37, the reviewer found the vehicle
disappointing--notably underpowered and mileage only marginally improved.
The major problem I have with the G25X is the price isn't that much cheaper than the G37X. $2,500 based on MSPR prices. Might as well poney up the extra $2.5k and buy the G37X. An extra nearly 110 horsepower for only $2,500 is very cheap in today's world. As for gas mileage... in real world driving, the G37X is not that much worse than the G25X. Infiniti should have made G25X maybe like $5k cheaper then I could see it being more successful, but only $2,500. why bother..williammoses wrote:A couple of months ago I read a review of the G25, but I can't remember where. My recollection is that compared to the G37, the reviewer found the vehicle
disappointing--notably underpowered and mileage only marginally improved.