Look for posts by 450zxtt, he has a twin turbo'ed VH45 in a Z32, mated to a 5 speed. Very nice .driftjunke wrote:I guess 300 in a 240 will be enough until we build a turbo setup for the VH.
E
Gotta love low tech 2 valve pushrod OHV heads.Q45tech wrote:The new 6.0 liter Corvette only makes 400HP/400lb/ft based on displacement our engines would make 300/300 at the same level of tune.
Yep, that's why all the F1 teams use them.Jesda wrote:The Corvette engine also consumes a very small physical space, revs to 7000, costs little to manufacture, and does 27mpg on the highway. Its low weight and physical size allows for better positioning and more balanced handling -- a configuration inspired by the handling gurus at Mazda.
Displacement matters little when your engine is the size of Texas and drinks like Whitney Houston. HP/liter is a pointless argument with little real-world relevance.
The new Z06 makes 505/475 with a 7.0 litre engine.Q45tech wrote:The new 6.0 liter Corvette only makes 400HP/400lb/ft based on displacement our engines would make 300/300 at the same level of tune.
Hey there, Apple? I want you to meet your arch nemesis, the orange.maxnix wrote:Yep, that's why all the F1 teams use them.
Let me bold that to get a few peoples attention.driftjunke wrote: ... We will be using the Z32 transmission with an adaptor plate, and we will make a couple extra plates for those interested in doing the manual conversion on their Q's.
E
Yeah, but where they fail is high speed passing or anywhere in upper RPM ranges.Jeff Williams wrote:Where the OHV engine really shines is the low-RPM torque. Which, in my opinion, is where you "feel" the most in the buttometer.
Can you imagine the size of a 7.0 litre DOHC engine? It definitely would not fit between the front suspension of the new C6.
Q45tech wrote: Getting much more than 340 lb/ft from a NA 4.5 liter is tough while still meeting even weak 1990 emission standards.........even if you raised the HP peak to 6900 [via new cams and intake/exhaust design] you would be lucky to exceed 370 HP.
Even the new LS460 [direct injection] only makes 380 HP from 4.6 liters.
HashiriyaS14 wrote: I imagine that with a 5-liter or 5.1 liter stroker, and a couple of bolt-ons, you could make 400hp all NA and be quite driveable indeed.
How about 394 to 400 HP from an NA 4.2 liter V8 With a redline of 7500, maximum horsepower is attained at 7000 RPM in the Ferrari/Maserati 4.2 V8. Maximum torque equals the VK45DE's 333 lb/ft, but at 500 greater RPM than the VK & VH45DE's (292 lb/ft rated) peak torque RPM.Q45tech wrote: Scares me when people speak of HP instead of peak torque output.......because you don't know at what rpm they are proposing.Because just increasing rpm from 5.5k>8k would bump HP by 45%
At least Pinks 400HP on conventional gas [what you might be able to find at most gas stations in US] is believable.
Rsiwicki and Sijoko are already within a breath of where I'd like to be performance wise with a G50.Q45 tech wrote: Just wait til you get the $15,000 quote, we have gone thru this exercise dozens of times: rods, pistons, cams, springs, new runners and plenum. Custom engine management and headers. Oem Q injectors are good to 450 HP [NA] at 43.4 psi [3 bar].
You could always swap in a VK45 or Northstar. They're worn out from the factory for your convenience.qship96 wrote:maybe I should stop changing that damn Redline oil every 5,000 miles afterall !!!!
PRICELESS.Jesda wrote:Dennis, when a Corvette comes riding up on your tail in the left lane, be sure to shake your fist and tell them how terribly inefficient they are!
That'll show 'em. Yeah, right in the jugular!
I never knew that a loose ring seal would create more horsepower. What are we all thinking when we hone our cylinders and put new rings in??Q45tech wrote:
Changing Q rings so it burns a little oil could provide 12-15 more HP alone.