Post by
Exar-Kun »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/exar-kun-u1725.html
Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:50 am
There's are two things to keep in mind with tires
1. No tire and wheel is truely round, and they all have a "high" and "low" spot.2. A a result of this, every tire and wheel also has a heavy spot.
Now, the heavy spot and high/low spots are generally not in the same place.
No as far as tires go, the better the manufactuing process (like..michelin for example) the more minimised those bad attributes are.
There are a few ways to ensure a good balance, and ahving a good tech doing it is primary. But, a better tire will roll smoother and now have the large heavy spots of a tire that's assembeled with less precise methods, or subjected to a lower quality controll level.
WHen I did someone balancing on an expensive car wth lower end tires, it made me cringe for that exact reason. Now, you can do a few things:-match the eavy spot to the light spot (tire/wheel) or vice versa-match the low spot to the high spot or vice versa.
Idealy, you'd net a similar result with each method, but in practice this sin't true. Just because an assembly "rolls well" (IE, it douesnt move left/right or up down when its spinning because the low and high spots are in good alignment) doesn't mean that it will be better ballanced, weight wise.
This also applies in reverse. A well ballanced wheel (taking litle weight) might roll like crap.
Also, yes with an AWD drivetrain, you want to minimize the difference in both tread type, depth and size otherwise it amy cause damage. Obviouly driving on a 215-55-17 for 10 miles won't kill you, but if you did it for a long distance it will put a lot of undue stress on the drivetrain...
You'll want the keep your spare and regular tires mathced pretty well to avoid that debacle.
-Chet