Post by
Ever Victorious »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ever-victorious-u44595.html
Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:55 am
Seat belt tensioners are not used in determining whether or not the airbag deploys. There are a couple parts that ARE... there are some shock sensors in the car (generally, 2 in each bumper and 2 in each side for models that have side air bags) that detect the severity of a collision and trip a circuit if it's "over 17MPH" (speed difference), and then the other part is for the passenger airbag only, which is a cutoff switch. If it detects less than 120 lbs in the passenger seat (at least that's the typical threshhold on most models), it will deactivate the passenger airbag.
Seatbelt tensioners are a part that help seat belts slow you down less violently in a severe collision. In a lower-speed collision, the seatbelt will just lock up and stop you. In a more severe collision, the belt will lock, tear a metal tab, lock again, tear another tab, etc. etc... at very high speed, so it slows your body down with a less severe shock. You end up traveling forward farther, but more slowly.
This is why seatbelts also need to be replaced after every single accident, yet for some reason I rarely see it happen.
This is further confirmation of my suspicions that I outlined in the "versa sucks" thread, re: my theory on your car.
Edit: They were right to give you a loaner car because the tensioners are broken... not because the airbags would be affected, but because the belts no longer have the ability to stop you properly. They'd either lock up and cause a more severe shock to your system, or they wouldn't and you'd end up hitting the air bag as if you weren't strapped in at all. Quite dangerous... and if my theory is correct, THIS is a case where the car SHOULD be replaced.