Scarlet731 wrote:We are choosing between 2014 Rogue & Outback. I would like to know about the interior comfort and ride experience. General comments on any aspect are welcome. One worry are the seats, as they seem to end sooner than other seats. On longer trips: do you find them becoming uncomfortable on the back of the thigh? Are they too confining after an hour?
Is any of the new suspension and braking tweaks a problem either with the ride or with brake wear?
Does the transmission become loud if the car is fully loaded and one cruises at 70 - 75 mph?
We've only had our '14 Rogue for two weeks, but here's what I can share...
1) Interior Comfort & Seats: the longest trip I've taken so far is a one-hour drive and I had no fatigue issues. I've had lower back issues in the past and some cars are uncomfortable for me - the Rogue has been great. The seats are short on thigh support like you mention, but I haven't noticed that to have any comfort repercussions - I think that is due to the upright seating position. The seats aren't too confining for me - I'm used to a little more side bolstering, but this isn't meant to be a corner carver.
2) Ride & Brakes: the ride comfort is quite good in the Rogue - it feels planted, solid, very refined and quiet. Most bumps are absorbed well. Can't speak to brake wear yet with 400 miles on the odometer, however. With as unobtrusive as the chassis control features operate, I doubt they contribute to too much brake wear - at least I hope not.
3) Highway cruising: one of the things I loved about the CVT in my wife's Versa was how it kept the RPMs low at 70+ MPH with only a 1.8L under the hood. My Mazda3 with a 2.3L turns higher RPMs at the same speeds with a conventional 5-speed AT. For comparison, a Honda Fit 5-speed MT is a buzzy mess, turning near 4k RPMs at 70 MPH.
I haven't noted the exact RPMs in our Rogue yet, but it also keeps the engine hushed at low RPMs cruising at 70 MPH. Give it an abrupt stab at the accelerator and you'll dial up the RPMs - but the CVT is better at allowing smooth operation, rather than a conventional auto that would kick down to shift out of overdrive.
ImStricken wrote:id be more worried about the timing BELT in the subaru, versus the timing CHAIN in the nissan. that for me is a deal breaker. chain wins all day, every day.
Great point. I was shocked when my brother-in-law needed a new timing belt in his '08 Acura TL - surprised Honda still used a belt as well. I like Nissan's use of timing chains.
I'm not well educated on Subaru's boxer engines, but I think they also need careful attention to head gasket replacement - and that's not something I've had to worry about on Nissan's engines.