proxim2020 wrote:
I agree 100%. Pretty much all of the hatchbacks created over the last few years have similar amounts of interior space. I read more complaints about how space is used versus amount of available. There should be an emphasis on saving gas primaily. I guess since the majority of the hatchback get at or above 30mpg, they had to come up with something that makes them stand out. Kia's got their warranty. Toyota and Honda got their name and better EPA estimates. Suzuki.....Poor Suzuki. They make good bikes, but I can't say the same about their cars.
Well, first of all, the Kia only gets about 24 mpg in the city under realistic conditions. The 34mpg highway rating is REALLY a stretch.
Yeah, a lot of cars are too big. The V isn't one of them, it's just right IMO. I haven't been able to get close enough to a Fit to sit in or drive one, but the Yaris was both uncomfortable and too small, the Kia's lack of adjustable steering column is bad news for my knees, the Aveo is a joke (like every other Daewoo), the Accent actually loses some of the useful space that the Kia brother had...
I also haven't had any of the competitors to test actual seat comfort. The V is actually quite nice... my old Kia (Optima) would give me a pain in my right butt cheek (literally) after driving it for about 50 miles, which in my job, I cover before 10 am. I've driven the V 370 miles in one day without a hint of muscle pain or fatigue.
As long as I'm getting 30mpg, can carry all my crap, and not feeling like I've constantly been throwing around furniture, I'm happy.