Again, you're comparing to peaks. If you want to look at trends, spread your time horizon out to 5 and 10 years and tell me what you see. Or even start with 1990. You'll see the fall of 2002 to be just below trend as is today and you'll see the peaks.rn79870 wrote:Yeah, the Dow went down 245 points a few days ago. I don't see people rushing out put their life savings in the stock market now...The dow as of 7/12/08Last 6 Months, -12.62%. Last 12 Months, -17.19%.
It goes from 14160 to 11600 in a the last year and a one day climb is good news? That's a loss of over 2500 points. The trend is still falling.
Yes, we are. The question is are you on the same planet as everyone else?telcoman wrote:Are we on the same planet?
THERE IS NO RECESSION.peetar wrote:So much for the sky falling and Joe Bidens comments about how bad off the economy is. Let's say it together: THERE IS NO RECESSION.I know that makes some of you sad but you seriously need to look at your thinking when you NEED the economy to be bad for your political views to take root. How sick is that?
I wasn't so sure about all that, so I went looking and found this about 2007:smockers83 wrote:Growth and income. We have been growing, there is no question. However, the benefits of growth aren't being realized to everyone. They are only being realized by the already rich. In 2007, median salary fell. Income hasn't really grown for everyone but the rich, and in some cases it has fallen.
There isn't. I feel that a lot of people are experiencing a "personal recession" right now (due to less housing equity, slow wage growth, gas and price inflation, etc.), so they are quick to apply their situation to the broader economy. Then the media and politicians cater to their audience.peetar wrote:THERE IS NO RECESSION.
So now what do we do about the guy who wants to change the definition of recession so his party can take the White House?ishkabibble wrote:
There isn't. I feel that a lot of people are experiencing a "personal recession" right now (due to less housing equity, slow wage growth, gas and price inflation, etc.), so they are quick to apply their situation to the broader economy. Then the media and politicians cater to their audience.
Just out of curiosity, who disproved that? You seem to come from an economic background. I have yet to meet someone from an economic background that doesn't think the income gap is large and near historic levels. There are some out there, no doubt, but those that say its not there are evidence of the dual economy we live in.peetar wrote:So, what do we get in rebuttal? A bunch of vapid, esoteric drivel about how "the rich" are the only ones benefitting.
So, then we disprove that and what do we get as a rebuttal. Nothing AT ALL of substance.
Let's forward a copy of that to the auto workers who are getting a month off without pay because people won't buy cars now. I don't suppose they feel we are doing just fine and still growing. Sure, tell me it's all about not building the right cars, but before doing that, look at the sales figures, ALL but Mini is reporting lower sales, with many reporting losses.Even Honda is down.peetar wrote:...There is no truth in it and I will continue to point this stark fact out. Mainly because the economic numbers don't lie. We are doing just fine and are still growing. Which is the opposite of a recession by definition....
Boo hoo.rn79870 wrote:
Let's forward a copy of that to the auto workers who are getting a month off without pay because people won't buy cars now.
AZhitman wrote:Homebuying is up over last month.
Gas has fallen almost a buck.
Unemployment is dropping.
The Dow is climbing.
Remind me why we need The Great Pumpkin to come rescue the economy?
I put pig farm workers' kids through school!ishkabibble wrote:Well, you would just spend it on bacon and unreliable cars anyway.
AZhitman wrote:Homebuying is up over last month.
Gas has fallen almost a buck.
Unemployment is dropping.
The Dow is climbing.
Herding cats and getting economists to agree: two of the most difficult things to do on the planet.96Qowner wrote:Yep, and most economists agree.