ACURA IS WORTHLESS

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Image


WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?!?!?


User avatar
skydragoness
Posts: 9394
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 03' 350z Touring 6spd
92' 240sx 60k survivor :)
Location: North DFW, TEJAS
Contact:

Post

Image

Dem Rimz.

Seriously. Acura has lost their collective minds.
Kind of looks like an Avalon-Legacy (bleh)

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

You should see how the locals are loving this car...

I'm actually serious.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

ITS LIKE A KNOCKOFF SUBARY LEGAYCY

User avatar
sx moneypit
Posts: 8911
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:54 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
1986 Toyota MR2
Location: Memphis,Tn.

Post

:werd: :barf:

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

skydragoness wrote:Image

Dem Rimz.

Seriously. Acura has lost their collective minds.
Kind of looks like an Avalon-Legacy (bleh)
this This THIS!

User avatar
Otto.
Posts: 8432
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:24 pm

Post

What's up with that crease just before the front door? What is that there for? What the fuuuuuuu

...and those things on the rear bumper... are those just glued on?

Oh, and the wheels. Kill it with fire.

User avatar
alphapig
Posts: 1972
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:52 pm
Car: Nissan Altima Coupe S 2.5
Location: NorCal

Post

At least they stopped putting front grilles on the rear fascia

Image

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

THE FACE:
Image

User avatar
szh
Posts: 15932
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 12:54 pm
Car: 2018 Tesla Model 3.

Unfortunately, no longer a Nissan or Infiniti, but continuing here at NICO!
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

I dunno about this one. It looks pretty darn bland ... maybe a backlash from their more recent edgy models?

But, although I know a bunch of you all don't like the new NSX, I am drooling ... :dblthumb: So, I don't think that Acura has lost their mind totally anyway!

By the way, after 15 years, my wife's 1997 Acura 2.2CL finally lost its transmission a few months. Aside from that, it was by far the most reliable car I have ever owned (in the 38 years that I have been buying cars and driving). Her replacement is a 2011 Acura TSX ... with a body kit. Looks pretty nice, and she is hoping it will go a long, long time too.

Z

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

Otto. wrote:What's up with that crease just before the front door? What is that there for? What the fuuuuuuu

Oh, and the wheels. Kill it with fire
Wow I just noticed the crease I must agree that crease is aweful.. :barf:

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Jesda wrote:Image


WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?!?!?
Perhaps an example of why people buy old Acura's instead of new ones? I'm sure it'll be a pleasing car to drive, but it's not an attractive design. Acura seems to be chasing after the AARP-early-bird-special-old-fart-black socks with-sandals-geezer full-sized -sedan market. Since Toyota named their offering after a NJ shore town, maybe Acura will name their version similarly....."Point(less) Pleasant." ;)

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

Dude... if Acura fell off the face of the earth, I don't think anyone would notice.

Their car designers have needed a shot of adrenaline to the heart, and their employee doc in a box prescribed them weed instead.

For a company that made cars such as the NSX and Integra, they have certainly lost their way. Why would I buy this over an Audi A 4/5/6/7/8? A Mercedes CLS/C/E Class? A Lexus GS (identical to this thing but with wheels that don't look like they were designed on a spyrograph)? A Cadillac CTS? An Infiniti M?

If I were a shareholder for Acura, I would demand the CEO exile the design team, the marketing team, and whoever approved this design and start over.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

The RLX Looks like a Chevy Cruze from the back. It even has the same proportions. High standards!
I still think it's an improvement over the tribal tattoo look, but only because that's a very special kinda ugly.

I read C&D's RSS feed on my phone regularly on my lunch break. A couple weeks ago they had a post about the RLX, and in it they sounded more excited than I've ever been about even the most exotic supercar. It kinda made me feel a bit nausated. I had to close the page because the other people in the break room were looking at me uneasily as I swore furiously under my breath.
I've never been fond of the Legend (always preferred the Vigor/TL), and after it became the RL it devolved steadily into an purposeless, overweight blandmobile with a sticker price that's $15k too high.

I love big cars, but not big little cars. You can't just inflate a midsize family sedan and succeed.
The DTS/DeVille is successful because it's HUGE, ultra-luxurious, attractive, has torque to burn, and drives nice. The Avalon is successful because it's gigantic, comfortable, dependable, and AFFORDABLE.
The RL is a mess. Not particularly luxurious, lacking in torque, over-complicated and over-teched, not attractive, not very big, and coma-inducingly expensive. $48k BASE PRICE! What the SH@T is Acura thinking?! It's one thing to rebadge the "real" Accord and sell it with a $5k markup. But $50k will buy you a whole Hell of a lot of BMW, Mercedes Benz, Cadillac, Jaguar, or any number of other genuine luxury cars.

And this "AWD" with electric motors in the rear can choke to death on its own saliva.

I miss the Vigor. I miss '90s Acura's spectacularly low, limbo-champion beltlines. I miss the Acura that made FWD cars that were actually thrilling to drive.
All that's left of them is a shadow of a wannabe.

Oh well, maybe this will help MKS sales. Except wait a second...I don't want that at all!

Spot the difference!
Image
Image

User avatar
Rev_D21
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Car: 1986.5 D21 LB HD 2WD V6 5Speed
1991 D21 Reg 2WD Auto
1995 D21 Reg 2WD 5Spd
1996 D21 Reg 4WD 5Spd
2012 Versa 1.6S 5-Speed
Location: Somwhere in Western NY
Contact:

Post

Looks like a Genesis done badly. Clearly the Genesis was penned by an artist while the Acura is a donk.

Genesis looks good.
Image


Return to “General Chat”