riu wrote:NA z32's have a shorter final drive ratio in the rear end which makes them faster than TT Z32 rear ends
That's actually not completely true... the shorter rear's like the N/A are usually good for narrow power band engines (high revving N/A, boosted with oversized turbos, etc.)
When you have a very broad powerband (lost of mid-range and upper power) a longer rear like the TT and Q45 is better to use. You're able to get all of that torque to the ground for a longer period of time compared to the higher ratio. You also have lower cruising revs which can potentially get you better fuel economy to boot.
There's even a guy running a very low 3.xx rear in his Datsun and is looking to go even lower (high 2.xx rear). Everytime he put a lower ratio rear in his car, it got faster. He said it didn't feel faster... the numbers were simply better.
I'll be using the 5-speed with the Q45 3.538 differential and most likely 295-35-18 tires (I'd like to go wider though). If that doesn't give me wide gears... I don't know what would. That setup should give me a gear limited top speed of 205-210 depending on the RPM. (205 @ 7,000, 210 @ 7,200... can't remember what the VH's fuel cut was at but I'll probably change that around anyways.)