Fifth ace wrote:Modified by Fifth ace at 6:55 PM 12/6/2006
Engine WeightsWithout transmisison (figure +100-150lbs)CA18ET 118 kg 260 lbsQR25DE 121 kg 267 lbsCA18DET 128 kg 282 lbsSR20DE 139 kg 306 lbsSR20DET 149 kg 328 lbsKA24DE 167 kg 368 lbs (est)Fifth ace wrote:Ok so I want to buy an s13 and I want more power but I dont like the KA block, I need a engine swap then. This thread isn't about which engines will fit (they all do lol). The idea is that I want to drift the car and I'm worried about weight distribution. I've narrowed down the list to four candidates, the RB25, SR20, VQ35 and the VG30 (TT of course). I know the SR wont change weight much and is commonly used in drifting so its a good choice but i'd like more low-end and originality. Then there's the RB but it's pretty much like having an anvil under the hood. The VG surely ins't any lighter but beeing a V6 keep it closer to the center of mass. Finaly there is the VQ, V6, all aluminium and everything but it's rare and expensive so is it worth the trouble? So what do you guys think?
Modified by Fifth ace at 6:55 PM 12/6/2006
Really? I'll check that out. Thanks.redhat-z wrote:Try an early VH45DE from a G50. About 300hp, 80lbs heavier than a KA, and available in most junkyards for several hundred $$. My project is currently under way.
Thats a lot of info, thanks! The reason I don't like the KA is juste that I plan to make a lot of power in the long run and I don't think the KA block can hold together. As for the LS1, I just prefer japaneese . But the VG still seems like a good choice for me, it's lighter that I thought too. I can get one for 900 bucks plus shipping. The VH looks nice too and I'd love to put a 350 engine under my hood but I'm still concerned with the price. The RB25 just seems out of question with that kind of weight (doesn't it produces 250hp by the way?). Any other ideas? I'd love to hear feedback from people who did those swaps.Beercandrifter wrote:Engine WeightsWithout transmisison (figure +100-150lbs)CA18ET 118 kg 260 lbsQR25DE 121 kg 267 lbsCA18DET 128 kg 282 lbsSR20DE 139 kg 306 lbsSR20DET 149 kg 328 lbsKA24DE 167 kg 368 lbs (est)
With Transmission:KA24DE ~520 lbsSR20DET 490 lbsRB25DET 667 lbs (280 hp)VG30DET 589 lbs
After having doing research for balancing my S13, I ended up limiting the choices to the SR20DET, KA-T and LS1. The SR20DET is lighter than the KA by a little but costs ~2000$ more to build due to initial costs of the motor and will require mods to get good hp out of, the KA is the cheaper and easier of the options but you dont want a ka not sure why. The LS1 would be a good option because it dosnt throw off the balance because it is lighter than the KA (all alluminum block) and only runs about 2500 and starts you at about 350hp, the mounts and crossmembers are bolt up and are sold by several vendors. What I would ask myself is, do I want to be original with the car and stay nissan, so I want to get rid of a I4 and change it, do I want to go all jdm or oem, really depends what you want =)
I'm a rotary fan myself and I would never put anything else in my seven. And as I said I just prefer not to use a gm engine. Got nothing agaist it but american engines in american cars is my moto.prsfan wrote:The LS1 option is the "new thing" in the RX-7 world. If those Mazda guys can stand getting rid of there rotory, us Nissan guys should be able to handle it!
It's a good engine all around, plus you can fix it with a hammer. Upgrades are limitless also. More than 500+ hp avaliable with good tuning.
Good luckJ
I think LS1, being a OHV engine it will be very compact and potentially lighter then the VQ and VGs. 330rwhp and 330rwtq in a N/A form is nothing to joke about in a 2,600lb car. You'r going to sping the tires in just about any gear.Fifth ace wrote:So what do you guys think?
New thing? Where have you been? SBCs have been finding thier way into RX-7s since the early 80's. RX-7s are light, well built and have huge engine bays... need I say more?prsfan wrote:The LS1 option is the "new thing" in the RX-7 world. If those Mazda guys can stand getting rid of there rotory, us Nissan guys should be able to handle it!
It's a good engine all around, plus you can fix it with a hammer. Upgrades are limitless also. More than 500+ hp avaliable with good tuning.
Good luckJ
Well the low end I'll admit is more for my pure driving pleasure... Thats why a want a six, no replacement for displacement as they say. More torque is always useful to break tires loose anyway. I don't really need a perfect 50/50 weight distribution because that can be easily optained with a good suspension setup. I just dont want to get to the point where I get serious understeering, I want a car that's fast on its feet. Now doing a KA-T or CA build isn't out of the question. I know a VG or VQ swap is going to be a hell more lot of work but I'm not at my first motor swap and I like challenges. I dont think it's gonna be much more expensive in the long run howerver, bigger rad, stronger shaft, beefer trans, they're all in the plan anyway. And, yeah I'm still young, 18 in fact and still in college so this swap wont happen before a couple of month but I still got a back up plan while waiting. Have you ever seen a pink sonoma drift? I'd show a pic but I dont know how. lol1991S13 wrote:You don't like the KA block? What isn't there to like about an iron block and stock internals that can hold +/-350hp on a daily basis with a good tune?
Another question...why do you want low end in a drift car that is going to spend most its time bouncing off the rev limiter?
My opinion...don't worry about weight distribution. When you are building competition level drift cars, then take that into consideration. You're probably still young, so you should be more worried about building a fast but reliable street car that can also be fun to throw old tires on and drift on the weekends or whatever.
If you want some driftastic JDM-tyte s13, jump on the bandwagon, stick with what has been done, and throw an SR in it and burn rubber off into the sunset. The money spent swapping in a VG, VH, LS1 and all the other wild engines mentioned would be kind of a waste when you could build and turbo a KA or swap in an SR with bolt on's that would spank it for thousands less.
That's a great idea. I know I've never seen that.180fan wrote: If you're really dead set on maintaining a low center of gravity and a 6 cylinder, you might want to consider a 6 cylinder boxer, if you've already come to terms with a higher installation cost and don't mind down time.