nissangirl74 wrote:I wonder if it was an exercise in curbing impulse spending. For example, say you pass a Circle K on the way home everyday. You're hungry and you stop and get a drink and a snack. Say it's $3. If you did that for 20 days ( a month's worth of work days), that's $60. Or, say you buy your groceries at Wal-Mart every week. As you are going up front to check out, you walk past the clothing section and see a cool shirt. Impulse buy leads to <$15 in your bank account. You go through the line, and decide you want / need gum, mints, a bottle of hand sanitizer, and a People magazine. As you walk out to your car, you smell french fries from the McDonald's across the parking lot. You decide to eat lunch there, even though you just bought $50 in food. I can see their motivation, especially if they are prone to impulse buys like this. Not saying I would do it, but I can see why someone would.
Right. IMHO the story is actually about a family who eliminated 4 things: impulse spending, eating out, driving, and leisure activities that cost money (like movies and arcades) for a month. The title and teasers were misleading. The only thing that would have made the story legitimate is if they calculated out how much they really saved on those things. But to determine that, they would have needed to at least figure out the expenditures they averaged for the same # days before the project. And iF you subtract all the stuff they purchased to make it thru the cashless month from the savings, the final figure would probably won't be that impressive unless they were reckless.